English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 11 August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

who will we get to preside over the one world government and the new world order?

2006-08-11 06:15:07 · 16 answers · asked by W E J 4

The left will bring down America, I believe that sincerely but hope I am wrong. Despite my beliefs, I still try to think of ways to stop the inertia of defeat the left drives us toward.

Ultimately the problem is one of emotional and intellectual weakness. An inablity to cope with the real world which accounts for the insanity of "blaming everyone else but the culprit" that is epidemic among insane leftists.

You see leftists, I dont judge the Islamist...I dont. The Islamist is entitled to his view of global Jihad and worldwide submission to Muhammads view of God. However, because I reject that view, and am not suicidal or religious, I make the darwinian choice to resist this predator by whatever means I have at my disposal.

I say this dispassionately. I am agnostic and dont foam at the mouth at the idea that someone believes different than me...actually, that whole stereotype of Christians is leftist propaganda anyway.

2006-08-11 06:13:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

thse terrorist groups caused for the death of innocent civilians in all countries. the victims belonged to all religions. i have no words to denounce their crimes and i disdain their brutal ideology . what sort of punishment be given to those groups? and suggest how to eradicate terrorism ?

2006-08-11 06:10:13 · 18 answers · asked by evelyn 3

Think about it.... if the TSA was really serious about finding explosives why were they just tossing grannys denture cream into a garbage can.

That stuff should have been treated as HAZMAT.

2006-08-11 06:09:11 · 13 answers · asked by PARKERD 7

According to every report I read, Bush did receive updates from Blair, but this was entirely a UK operation to infiltrate the cell and take them down.

2006-08-11 06:08:27 · 6 answers · asked by rashonsnatch 1

recent postings by Marxists on this forum....

1. Bush invented the terror plot in the UK to scare voters into voting for republicans.


2. Bush is a bigger terroist than Bin Laden

3. Bush invented 911

4. Bush started the war on terror for oil profits.

5. Bush sent the huricanes to to la becasue he hates black people

6. rasied the terror level to scare people into voting republican

7. Bush creates a terror war victory before all elections

8. Bush is supressing our rights

9. Bush is a nazi

10. Bush is destroying America

11. bush is evil

12. Bush only cares for people earning over 800,000 a year

13. Bush lied

2006-08-11 06:03:47 · 17 answers · asked by W E J 4

During Desert Storm the world was on our side, including most Muslim people, when we and the UN went into Kuwait to win it back from a foreign invader.

After 9-11 the world was on our side, including most Muslin people, when we went into Afghanistan after Osama and those actually responsible for the Twin Towers attacks.

When we had Osama cornered and surrounded our President suddenly decided to pull back, leaving Osama’s capture in the hands of local war lords, and decided to focus on Saddam. At the time Saddam was not a serious threat to us or the world. He was just another piss ant little dictator in another little country. The terrorists were the ones we should have stayed on the trail of.

Still, we all but deserted catching Osama so that we could invade Iraq.

Now, much of the world has turned against us, including most Muslims.

Why can’t some understand that we went after the wrong bad guy at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons?

2006-08-11 06:02:32 · 3 answers · asked by Doc Watson 7

Its absolutely crazy to think any Republican is for the concept of war and wants to fight a war becasue they don't. I recently went to a political fundraiser and where Dick Cheney was speaking. He spoke very well and on my way out we noticed the protestors chanting something like "War lovers" or something like that. The liberal party is potraying Conservatives as people who want to fight and kill and like war and that is just not true. Conservatives support the war and support our troops but they don't want to be fighting a war when it really comes down to it anymore than the liberals and they don't want to be putting our troops in harms way. But just becasue they don't want to do those things does not mean its not neccasary and fortunately for this countries security the Conservatices can see that this is a neccasary but unfortuanate meausre that must be taken.

2006-08-11 05:59:48 · 8 answers · asked by stewcat123 1

Is it because they can be so far fetched, or that we just don't want to deal with complicated ideas?

2006-08-11 05:54:16 · 14 answers · asked by EZ 2

most of the people who answered my question nobel peace prize be given to terrorist groups like al qaida, talibans, lashker e toiba. i made those remarks sarcastically and i made caustic comments on those groups.my intention is not to support those religious fundamentalist groups caused for the death of several innocent civilians . i disdain all those groups and dinounce them as thugs. causing genocide in all countries without any aim.i request you to modify your answers

2006-08-11 05:53:01 · 5 answers · asked by evelyn 3

They're lying, right?

2006-08-11 05:52:30 · 14 answers · asked by Pseudo Obscure 6

Just a friendly reminder!

2006-08-11 05:51:36 · 8 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2

i miss having a president that passes policy's for all americans.

2006-08-11 05:51:17 · 19 answers · asked by david c 4

I had to drive through Coon Town today. While doing so, I saw a pack of crack cocaine smoking, blue gummed, red bumper lipped, kinky haired, sh-it colored, wide flat nosed, fish eyed pickaninies, who smelled like dead dogs, peeling bananas with their feet.

2006-08-11 05:47:34 · 10 answers · asked by Leif Ericson 1

Read This:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20060810/cm_usatoday/goreisntquiteasgreenashesledtheworldtobelieve

2006-08-11 05:41:28 · 19 answers · asked by SVern 3

After the Mid-terms. http://www.issues2000.org/CA/Nancy_Pelosi.htm

2006-08-11 05:40:55 · 10 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

It seems to me that real solutions to problems that face humanity will never be found while we support leaders that refuse to listen to the people they represent no matter their personal political affiliation.

2006-08-11 05:38:19 · 15 answers · asked by EZ 2

The Dems don’t have a voice in our government because they are in the minority, so their ideas will not win in a vote, simple as that. When they have a voice or one of the Majorities in November then you will hear ideas about fighting Terrorist. I have one from an Independent thinker ME . Pull out the troops in Iraq use the billions of dollars spent there to fund Intelligence operations, Intelligence technology, Clandestine Operations to attack Terrors cells, with the Navy Seals, Recon Marines, Black Ops, Army Ranger, and all the ones you don’t hear about. Let’s fight terror with the right tools, like cutting off funding to from countries like Iran and Serria. Lets use that money to beef up homeland security protect us here. You can’t fight Terrorist will Military you can only fight Military with Military. My way is not “Weak” it is just different. If you cared to notice the UK did not bust those terrorist with their military, it was good Intel and police work.

2006-08-11 05:30:45 · 17 answers · asked by DEEJay 4

the reason is in their attacks on innocent civilians died.recently in mumbai. the uk ofcourse foiled their attempt to do another 9/!!. had those terrorist groups did not kill them all those people might still be suffering from poverty, and other problems. these terrorist groups sent all those people where they need not face any problems. so those terrorist groups deserve nobel peace prize as the people who died in their hands got eternal peace.

2006-08-11 05:29:10 · 14 answers · asked by evelyn 3

The republicans have the gun-nuts, the racists, the Saudis, the Chinese, and the rabid evangelicals, while the Democrats have the green-extremists, the animal-rights extremists, the gay extremists, the feminist extremists, greedy lawyers (yuck), the Jewish bankers and hollyweird!
It would be so nice if we could just kick all of the damn lobbyists the hell out of Washington so our elected reps could just govern according to their now-forgotten constituency!

2006-08-11 05:26:09 · 10 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2

"The national government will maintain and defend the foundations on which the power of our nation rests. It will offer strong protection to Christianity as the very basis of our collective morality. Today Christians stand at the head of our country. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit. We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in the press — in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past years.”

2006-08-11 05:23:32 · 16 answers · asked by mcslain 2

take in to consideration recent history only. don't go back to bc

2006-08-11 05:21:13 · 16 answers · asked by evelyn 3

I mean, if democracy is the political system where we, the people, chose our way of living, studying, dressing ourselves up; is where we elect our governors, etc., why is not an expression of non-freedom the fact that we, the people, cannot choose the political system itself?

I've never know that a democratic country has, in a election, chosen to be a presidencialism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, a dictatiorship, etc. Is not it the privation itself of the so called freedom?

And the ones who cannot do the things that the riches can, are they also free people? They don't have money all right. Don't they have it bc of their own or bc of their political-social situation, which is before and greater then them?

Imagine that the riches pass all the year distribuing pocket money, a few buks for the poor ones. Is not it an expression and affirmation of human indignity? To survive with almses is a good thing, *~jessi~*?

Cahrity is good but not forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good job dudes!

2006-08-11 05:19:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

this is the first and last time i will ever post a question. i am tired of being reported by cry baby's. so why do people post questions then report you for having a different opinion? good bye my friends at answers it was short but sweet.

2006-08-11 05:14:16 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The two wars Iraq War and Vietnam War have things that are very alike, what are you views on it? And does the war change your view of President Bush?

2006-08-11 05:12:13 · 8 answers · asked by gissela v 1

I am agnostic and laugh at religion. The religions I detest the most are Islam and what is commonly called "Liberalism" however, in the correct meaning of the term, I am certainly very liberal on many issues.

Leftists dont really believe in evolution, they only claim to when they think an evil neocon is listening. See, leftists have tiny little brains and see things in simple dichotmous terms, like "neocon vs progressive" or "evil vs good". Evolution only serves them in the sense that it attacks Christians, but leftists dont apply it otherwise, as in the sense of "survivial of the fittest".

I dont know which freak world is worse, the Islamist world where men and woman are entirely separated or the left freak world where the world looks drab-grey and human progress comes to a Cuban stand still.

Leftists are in fact the weakest (most insecure) of us...their self-loathing and inablity to cope with darwinian reality is what makes the Islamist predator salivate.

2006-08-11 05:09:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why they do pull out of their skin? The term Israelites is very ancient of the Hebru Isralites who have already vanished.Surprise me with another fact please.

2006-08-11 05:06:36 · 6 answers · asked by coco 2

The point of terrorism is to through people into fear, right? to divide them to a point where they are unable to fight for themselves.

well, by constantly pointing your fingers at eachother and not offering a damn thing up, you are dividing the country! You are ALL buying into the Air America/Fox News propaganda that openly attacks those who have different opinions. Thos people who differ are dubbed 'stupid', 'loony' or 'unAmerican'.

There is a middle ground and the powers that be don't want you to find it. Both parties are responsible for where we are today and you feed them their power.

Did you know that polarizing the nation with name calling and accusations was harmful to us? Do you see it now? If so, what are you going to do about it? We will never 100% agree, but we can 100% work together and sacrifice to change America into what she was before she became a gluttonous whiner.

2006-08-11 05:06:20 · 13 answers · asked by DEP 3

here is a message I just received from one.

From: screwedbytheleft

Subject: Re: You are Lame!

Message: HAHAHAHAHA. Go **** yourself and your Hollywood queer boy husband of yours. Make sure you clean your double ended dildo that I'm sure you two enjoy.

LOL. LOSER!!!!!

2006-08-11 05:06:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

if the iraq people had a vote they would vote for us to leave, why not do what the will of the people want, isnt that true democracy. we have turned into occupiers and that is not good.

2006-08-11 05:01:57 · 28 answers · asked by david c 4

fedest.com, questions and answers