the reason is in their attacks on innocent civilians died.recently in mumbai. the uk ofcourse foiled their attempt to do another 9/!!. had those terrorist groups did not kill them all those people might still be suffering from poverty, and other problems. these terrorist groups sent all those people where they need not face any problems. so those terrorist groups deserve nobel peace prize as the people who died in their hands got eternal peace.
2006-08-11 05:29:10 · 14 answers · asked by evelyn 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
some people misunderstood my question. i made sarcastic, caustic remarks against those religious terrorists who caused for the death of several innocent civilians in all countries. i disdain all those thugs and denounce them as not human beings they deserve to be thrown to crocodiles in an ocean
2006-08-11 05:56:37 · update #1
some people misunderstood my sarcastic, caustic remarks made against those religious terrorists who killed several innocent civilians in all countries who deserve to be thrown to crocodiles in an ocean. i disdain their policies and denounce them as thugs and not to be treated as human beings. i request you to modify your answers.
2006-08-11 05:59:48 · update #2
It's hard to believe you're serious (or literate).
Coragryph, though generally correct, misspoke when he said that the Nobel doesn't go to purveyors of horrific violence. Once needs only to look at Yasser Arafat to learn that it does.
But, as anti-American the Nobel committee has been in recent years, I wouldn't be surprised by anything they do.
2006-08-11 05:45:11 · answer #1 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're conscious that Alfred Nobel, who the prize is named for, replaced into the inventor of dynamite, are not you? yet, sadly making conflict safer isn't a qualification for a Nobel prize. Prizes are presented for achievements in physics, chemistry, physique shape or drugs, literature and for peace. not conflict. And, in case you're thinking, specific you may win it extra desirable than as quickly as and countless different have. z
2016-10-01 22:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Typically the Nobel prize goes to real peace makers not abstract concepts of peace (not that there is anything wrong with abstract concepts)
Bush should get a Nobel Peace Prize. The RNC owes it to him
Go big Red Go
2006-08-11 05:36:12 · answer #3 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no i don't agree with you because no ones life is free from problems it is the essence of life and what about the families of those people?
and suppose that the mother or father or both are dead what would be the future of their children ?
people should live in peace, the powerful should be tolerant and help the weak, the rich should help the poor and so on
that is what God in any religion created us for
2006-08-11 05:47:05 · answer #4 · answered by Different 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People don't generally get the Peace Prize for acts of horrific violence.
2006-08-11 05:31:13 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are the Queen of Stupid Liberals grab a Burka and join them.
2006-08-11 06:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This represents truly warped logic. According to your thinking, Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein should also get it.
2006-08-11 05:43:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those people may have got internal peace and their lives maybe better but that was not their place to choice. I do not want someone to tell me that I would be better off dead - do you?!@
2006-08-11 05:36:27 · answer #8 · answered by nswblue 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
thats the dumbest thing I ever heard..with that logic hitler should have been given the peace prize also. Drink another you wacko.
2006-08-11 05:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by ajwpoet 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
in my opionion every muslim that even 1/2 thinks they support the murdering muslims like your groups you mention, should be hunted down and sent to their virgins in the sky.
2006-08-11 05:35:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋