The Dems don’t have a voice in our government because they are in the minority, so their ideas will not win in a vote, simple as that. When they have a voice or one of the Majorities in November then you will hear ideas about fighting Terrorist. I have one from an Independent thinker ME . Pull out the troops in Iraq use the billions of dollars spent there to fund Intelligence operations, Intelligence technology, Clandestine Operations to attack Terrors cells, with the Navy Seals, Recon Marines, Black Ops, Army Ranger, and all the ones you don’t hear about. Let’s fight terror with the right tools, like cutting off funding to from countries like Iran and Serria. Lets use that money to beef up homeland security protect us here. You can’t fight Terrorist will Military you can only fight Military with Military. My way is not “Weak” it is just different. If you cared to notice the UK did not bust those terrorist with their military, it was good Intel and police work.
2006-08-11
05:30:45
·
17 answers
·
asked by
DEEJay
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
You cant say someone is weak if they dont make the rules. How can you honestly say that they cant do better then the Republican in office now. They have to prove themselves first. Im not say they can do better but I can say let give them the chance to prove it because we are going in the wrong direction my friend
2006-08-11
05:36:38 ·
update #1
they do have plains you just cant get them past through congress so you dont hear about them Watch CSpan and not Fox News
2006-08-11
05:38:37 ·
update #2
I dont have a problem with wire taps just get the paper trail that show you were spying on terrorist and not on the quaker groups. Thats all. The only issue I have is that my fellow Marines yes DeeJay was a Marine are being used in a manner that is not apropriate to there mission
2006-08-11
05:43:21 ·
update #3
America is sick of it too...recent polls suggest America does not think republicans can do a better job then dems with regards to national security and terrorism....
Repukes had one ace in the hole and that was it...
Now if dems can just not trip over their own feet in the next 3 months....
2006-08-11 05:35:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Franklin 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Democrats surrender in the morning, surrender in the evening, just like the French after all they are now the American wing of the French Socialist Party. The Democrats believe the UN can accomplish great things like all the cease fire agreements and Clinton Policy positions that litter the Valleys of Lebanon. You fire Joementum and Hire I can't wait to surrender and splendid wasp Ned Lamont. Democrats seperate Iraq from the rest of the war against Islamic Fascisim and deny linkage with Al Queda ignoring the fact that there was intimacy between Iraq and the bearded ones and ignore the recent discovery of WMD in Iraq, and the issue that Joe Wilson had it WRONG in Niger. Now that the War has indeed gotten BIGGER You whine that you are not weak, The real problem is that Your party has no REAL MEN left in it because there is a total lack of testicular fortitutde. Rest assured Hollywood will save you,The Universities will Save you, The Unions will Save you from Islamic Fascists and George Bush. I will opt for the military option thank you. I researched 1938 and remember.
2006-08-11 06:23:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Iraqi conflict substitute right into a necessity for financial motives. regrettably President Bush (and our congress) lied to the yank human beings relating to the justifications we mandatory to dethrone Hussein. that's the fault of the two our considerable political events. the reason we weren't out and in of Iraq faster is with the help of undesirable judgements made by applying the administration interior the commencing up of the attack on Iraq. The Democrats have not had yet another plan because of the fact one does no longer exist. some idiots say pull out the troops now. some idiots say deliver in greater troops. some idiots say nuke em'. What we choose is honesty and actuality. we could proceed coaching Iraqi troops and pulling U.S. forces out of direct touch and conflict with the Iranians as quickly as experienced Iraqi military instruments can take over. the two a build up and a withdraw of troops are undesirable solutions to fixing this. Left wing protesters weaken our negotiating understanding international extensive. So does the conceitedness of Americas stunning wing and the Bush administration. a real Conservative is one that believes in negotiating the subject and fixing it logically. regrettably our legislators are divided by applying social gathering and money and haven't any good judgment. conflict is a mandatory evil of Capitalism so in case you prefer to confirm the U.S. proceed to proceed to exist as a unified county, you will get far flung from extremes and attempt to decide on hassle-free human beings to public workplace, no longer the non secular enthusiasts of the left and stunning.
2016-11-04 09:03:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by winstanley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. Because Democrats did not make the knee-jerk reaction that Republicans made, they were viewed as weak on the issue. Had the time been taken to really adapt a more competent strategy, I believe things would be totally different. Now the GOP is running out of time and the people are running out of patience.
2006-08-11 05:39:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I totally agree with you about pulling money out of threats. I favored drilling in Alaska to remove our dependency on foreign oil, meanwhile, beefing up our efforts on alternative energy. But the democrats would have no part of it. And if I recall, democrats also blocked funding for anti-missile defense. Democrats favor diplomacy over military action...and that is weak...you cannot work things out with people who are going to hate and kill you no matter what.
Your ideas are good. But the democrats won't go for it.
And the military is utilizing their special mission groups in Iraq.
2006-08-11 05:38:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by redfernkitty 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
How do expect your clandestine operations to work with the current backlash against our current admin's use of wire taps and surveillance?
Pulling out our troops has nothing to do with your terror prevention. Sounds like you've got other issues.
2006-08-11 05:39:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike K 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
to all of you repubs,when will you accept the fact we can not be the worlds policeman.if thats the case we will be in a war every single month,and will all men be happy to lay down there lives for a war we dont believe in i sure wont,its time for our elected officals to use a little brain power and think these things through
2006-08-11 16:16:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well people say they have a weak voice becasue of what they say and what they feel should be done. Thats why they will remain in the minority becasue people dont like their passive approach to an aggressive enemy.
2006-08-11 05:38:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by stewcat123 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Democrats don't have a voice? I can hear Barbara Boxers shrill pitch in my nightmares. It's when they use their voice that they sound weak on terror.
2006-08-11 05:41:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by loubean 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, when they were in power, the common response was either nothing or firing a few missiles at an empty building or abandoned training camp. Just review Bill Clinton's pathetic record.
2006-08-11 05:36:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Black Fedora 6
·
1⤊
3⤋