You really are bored today aren't you.
You use terminology that is ill-defined, and change the definitions to support your points. You arguments are very well-written, but don't carry any substance. As a result, you don't make a solid point that can be supported or refuted, just hollered at like at a carnival.
Yes, of course, every stereotype is propaganda. That doesn't make it more or less true. Propaganda is anything that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause.
And of course the problem is "emotional and intellectual weakness". And that's true of all sides in the fight. Those who go purely based on emotion without reason, and those who have no passion for their position, are always at a disadvantage relative to those who are both passionate and logical.
Just as those who blame everyone else as an excuse to avoid having to argue the merits of their case. Which is exactly what your posts are doing -- a lot of frothing and a lot of spin, to avoid having to say anything that can be rationally argued one way or the other.
2006-08-11 06:14:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
"An inablity to cope with the real world which accounts for the insanity of "blaming everyone else but the culprit" How ironic, if you actually read the lies and crap that you post. *Who* is blaming *Who*??? lol.
And do you understand what Darwinian is? rofl. Obviously the "intellectual weakness" isn't just on the left.
"actually, that whole stereotype of Christians is leftist propaganda anyway" Actually, it's not. Take a stroll around here sometime. Take a peek at the 700 club website or all those other website talking about the end of the world and how terrible, vile, sinister, and immoral non-Christians are. I assume that this is the propaganda you speak of, but your argument is so poorly worded that I can't be sure.
2006-08-11 13:24:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets deal with this piece by piece:
"The left will bring down America". Personally, I thing the far right is doing a much better job of that than any lefty ever could.
Your 2nd paragraph seems to describe the VAST majority of those on the Right, not the Left. "An inablity to cope with the real world" - think Fox news and a leader who doesn't read or watch news but gets his information from handpicked "advisers". "blaming everyone else but the culprit" - When your leaders illegally invaded, occupied, and tortured the people of a sovereign nation that was no threat to us, who am I supposed to blame for that, Zimbabwe?
Your 3rd paragraph. First you say " I don't judge the Islamist" then you go on to judge Islam. If you knew ANYTHING about Islam, you would know that it is a religion of peace. Small groups have perverted it, like Christianity and Judaism (which all share the same God), to further their own agenda.
The only thing I partially agree with is your last line. Christianity, in it's true form, is leftist. It has been perverted from the teaching of love and tolerance to the preaching of hatred and intolerance by the far right.
2006-08-11 16:03:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Funny how a Conservative is using a Darwinian tactic. I thought that they rejected anything about Darwin. "...that whole stereotype of Christians is leftist propaganda anyway." And the stereotype of Liberals is Conservative propaganda. So what's your point? This is a country where people stereotype...it's typical. I fail to see what your real question is. You appear to ask one, but proceed to answer it with your own ranting. The left will not bring down America because they ran the country for years and didn't have the problems that the right has caused today.
2006-08-11 13:35:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by bluejacket8j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You pose an interesting question since Darwin espoused the theory of Evolution. A theory that has been attacked by those on the political right. Christian conservatives have rejected this idea on the strict basis of theological polemics. I am a democrat, but I have views that are traditionally conservative: balanced budget, states rights, less government interference(especially when it comes to moral issues, I only want my wife in bed with me, not the government) and fewer foreign entanglements. Let someone else police the world. We need the money for our own infrastructure. You seem like a bright guy, but when you use terms like leftists(what the hell is a leftist, I happen to be right handed) you lose credibility. The world is not black and white. You have to discern reality through the haze of greys.
2006-08-11 13:33:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only way to help them is through evolution. Species evolved step by step, small changes at a time...so must the extreme right and extreme left. I would suggest fear as they seem to like to use that emotion as the "crack" that binds them. They must be made full aware that their "party" will in fact become extinct should they not move their political views towards the center and moderate voter. The moderates are in the majority and the leftists very existence is in their hands.
The GOP is well aware of this and THAT is why they control both houses and the executive branch.
2006-08-11 13:24:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems to me that the leftists identify with darwinian theory more than those on the right; at least in a purely scientific context. Your point about blaming everyone but the culprit is a valid one and I agree that the left is much more guilty of this than the right. I prefer to spend my time in the middle; too far left OR right is a bad place.
2006-08-11 13:19:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Report Abuse 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You just judged Islam when you said they want global Jihads and worldwide submission. Only some extreme Muslims want this. It's a stereotype, and it's wrong of you to perpetuate this.
To apply Darwinism to human society is a very dangerous thing. Have you heard of eugenics? Some very awful things have occurred because of the belief of Darwinian fitness as a justification of killing. Perhaps your wording is off?
2006-08-11 13:28:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by maguire1202 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anti-depressants and / or anti-anxiety medications.
I'm dead serious - the crazies on the left are worry-warts of the first order and, in most cases, are completely unable to think their way out of a paper bag. They're too busy FEELING and expect to be taken seriously for it.
That leaves us picking up the slack for them - so we'll have to continue being strong while they coast along on our efforts.
2006-08-11 13:17:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Walter Ridgeley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Species evolved step by step, small changes at a time"
No they did not. Species evolve through genetic mutations and is not a slow gradual process. It happens sporadically and in big jumps, not by small changes. Species can exist for millions of years with little to no change. You have a common misconception about evolution.
2006-08-11 13:38:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by beren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋