English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 15 June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

i've heard this over and over, but i don't know what the hell it is? i know it has something to do with republicans but im just making an inference.

2006-06-15 17:02:30 · 10 answers · asked by Cyrus 4

2006-06-15 17:00:44 · 13 answers · asked by me29876_ 2

Just goes to show what an idiot he was for saying something!

2006-06-15 16:48:27 · 11 answers · asked by Sidereality 3

2006-06-15 16:37:51 · 16 answers · asked by j h 1

The new theme for the liberals is to say that the iraqi intelligence was "rigged", not mistaken.

I want to know what year Bush (as they say he rigged it) did so, since I have some quotes from before he was in office:

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

2006-06-15 16:34:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

WHERE amd HOW have you benefited from tax cuts? Where is the extra money you have from your tax cuts? where did you spend that money?

2006-06-15 16:20:06 · 11 answers · asked by khaoticwarchild 3

The Clintons said they are:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

2006-06-15 16:14:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

This isn't about Bush...

Do American's want Hillary Clinton as their next President?

2006-06-15 16:12:34 · 36 answers · asked by Brianne 3

2006-06-15 16:05:34 · 22 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2

Having studied the base of the republican party and the democrat base, I have realized that the two groups are at far ends of the spectrum, Now this is not absolute, there are always other examples, But for the most part this is true. and pretty much sums it up.

Democratic base:
Trial attorneys, pedophiles, criminals, peta, aclu, elf, pro-choicers, socialist, entitlement majority, illegal immigrants (even though they can't vote??????), moronic colege students who don't have a clue about life, most of San Francisco, hollywood, unions (but not the majority they represent) and the blame everyone else for our behavior crowd.

On the other side

The majority of the republican base is filled with
Blue collar workers, working families,law enforcement, firefighters,
small business owners, larger business owners and yes corporations, (welfare recipients never gave anyone a job), And 90% of our soldiers,

Argue, lie, spin as much as you want libs, your time is almost up.

2006-06-15 16:03:46 · 7 answers · asked by tyler.durden 2

This; The most powerful Country in the world bar none. U.S.A.

2006-06-15 15:55:15 · 9 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2

This is for a research project

2006-06-15 15:50:41 · 5 answers · asked by soccerdog237 1

2006-06-15 15:47:52 · 10 answers · asked by Jess H 2

dont sell your freedom inexchange of security!
you will end up losing both your freedom and your security.


what is happening to america??

2006-06-15 15:46:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I love this country to the point where it hurts. I have three (THREE!)
brother in Iraq. My mother gives money every month to perserve the out beautiful national wild life.
I love my brothers, thats why i want them home and not fighting. Do you understand me conservatives??

2006-06-15 15:39:57 · 12 answers · asked by khaoticwarchild 3

Yes

or

No

2006-06-15 15:26:59 · 18 answers · asked by Todays choices tomorrows world 3

2006-06-15 15:19:23 · 23 answers · asked by greg c 1

Terrorism is the most painful thing for the Whole World ...we have to do something to finish it

2006-06-15 15:16:06 · 18 answers · asked by Nikul R 1

2006-06-15 15:03:15 · 8 answers · asked by AggieMom 2

2006-06-15 15:02:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-15 14:39:44 · 9 answers · asked by ? 4

Two answers please - one word each.
1. I am self employed - YES or No
2. I am Republican - YES or No

2006-06-15 14:38:09 · 13 answers · asked by computer_pc_doctor 2

OK liberals go at it you don't need to convince me but best answer goes to the most insightful answer. I have my reasons but I want to hear more.

2006-06-15 14:33:08 · 27 answers · asked by Neilman 5

This one is going to get ugly!

2006-06-15 14:18:53 · 13 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2

The editorial stated that Bill Clinton is so well respected around the world that he would make an excellent U. N. General Secretary. The article further states that there are 2 problems: the U. S. is a permanent member of the U. N. Security Council and as such it would be difficult to have any one from the U. S. selected to what is essentially supposed to be a neutral post; and that Hillary is running for president, and if she is elected it would mean that other countries would have a hard time selecting the spouse of a head of state into the most powerful U. N. post. The article does have a ray of hope: that Hillary could put her presidential ambitions on hold to have Bill selected as the U. N. head honcho. Paraphrasing the editorial: the world needs Bill more than the U. S. needs Hillary.
True or untrue?

2006-06-15 14:17:48 · 10 answers · asked by Modest intellect 4

fedest.com, questions and answers