English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The new theme for the liberals is to say that the iraqi intelligence was "rigged", not mistaken.

I want to know what year Bush (as they say he rigged it) did so, since I have some quotes from before he was in office:

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

2006-06-15 16:34:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

here is one for you dark, so you are saying the Al Qaeda part was rigged, but not the wmd part?, lol. Come on, you can spin it:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also GIVEN AID, comfort, and sanctuary TO TERRORISTS, INCLUDING AL QAEDA members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

2006-06-15 16:40:52 · update #1

NEFARIOUS: """""imminent nuclear threat""""

NO CHIT

2006-06-16 01:36:56 · update #2

10 answers

President Bush didn't "rig" anything. What I find interesting is that these people seem to forget that there is a record of things they said in the past. Thanks for pointing this out though.

2006-06-15 16:41:06 · answer #1 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1 3

The WMD software, definite. assisting terrorists, definite. assisting AQ, no. They edited the comments to say that AQ became energetic in Iraq. What they took out became that AQ became energetic in places Saddam couldn't attain. The Southern and northerly No Fly Zones. THey suggested that AQ's enormous choice 2 guy surpassed by Baghdad. What they took out became that he became hospitalized previous to joing AQ. we are also speaking about an administration that became pushing legislations by without giving absolutely everyone a danger to study it. gazing C-SPAN and senators from both facet were bitching about it. i am going to't save in recommendations what it became yet they did not obtain the bill until eventually Saturday evening and they had to vote on it that Monday. Who the following can study and make experience of a 2000-web page document in 36 hours? i don't believe each thing that MoveOn sends. I analyze and communicate with those that are experts. i'm an autonomous and larger of a loose philosopher. I voted Bush Sr contained in the ninety 2 election. i presumed he did the right element. His econimic plan became starting up to paintings and Clinton were given the credit for that. AS for Junior...he's not any longer wise sufficient to do some thing. yet Cheney and organization having been pushing to invade Iraq because the mid-ninety's and performance been targeted on politics plenty longer.

2016-11-14 20:22:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hi, how are you.

heres my rebutale.

Former Secretary of State, Colin Powell, told Robert Sheer that neither he, nor the State Department ever believed Iraq posed an imminent nuclear threat and blames Vice President Dick Cheney for pushing these false notions onto the president.

You get an A for effort but a F for Delievery.

2006-06-15 16:54:09 · answer #3 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0 0

No where in that quote does it say anything about him supporting AQ. Did he support terrorists? Yes. But so did Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt....

AQ was active in the the Northern and Southern No-Fly zones where Saddam couldn't reach them. AQ number 2 man passed through there and was hospitalized in Baghdad PRIOR to joining AQ. But after much editing it became "AQ was active in Iraq and the number 2 man was hospitalized in Baghdad." I know of several people that worked on the 9/11 report that bailed out when what they sent up was changed. I worked with a Captain that was up for Admiral Lower half and he withdrew his nomination and submitted his resignation instead.

2006-06-15 16:38:21 · answer #4 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0 0

More funny nick antics here: http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-qYz8IM8wf6cDPVKdRzVKExsCkGqv?p=43#comments

I'd just like everyone to know that I have battered down nicolasraage very easily. He is yapping about how liberals can't tink for themselves.

I got fed up with his schoolyard tactics, in a message pointing out that he was, like a kindergartener, making up stories about others so they wouldn't tease him about what he is doing (Lying!!).

He replied asking me what I hate about Ann Coulter.

I replied saying how well he changed the subject but humored him with a few solid reasons Ann is a *****.

He replied, and said that if he didn't answer the question, then my question was worded poorly. I had at no point asked a question.

I told him this in an email and he responded yelling "what the he** are you talking about", which was absolutely inapplicable in the situation.

If you are looking for a good laugh, I recommend trying this. It is great fun.

2006-06-16 03:28:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mac Guru 4 · 0 0

It wasn't rigged it was selectively filtered. He chose to ignore the intelligence that was contrary to the answers he wanted and convinced himself that he was doing the right thing.

2006-06-15 16:38:49 · answer #6 · answered by dullorb 3 · 0 0

Bush didn't rig anything he was just too stupid to look into the wmd more thoroughly

2006-06-15 16:38:07 · answer #7 · answered by Neilman 5 · 0 0

Hey now, I didn't say that.. And he didn't say it about the quote your putting up either. Stop spinning everything!! Typical Republican!! haha.

Yea Rosi, go check it retard.
Also answer that question of mine I know you seen and didn't answer...

2006-06-15 16:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has no intelligence whatsoever. He couldn't have rigged it

2006-06-15 16:38:56 · answer #9 · answered by oveningskor 4 · 0 0

liberal idiots

2006-06-16 06:44:32 · answer #10 · answered by ballin 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers