Other - Politics & Government - December 2006

2006-12-25 02:15:16 · 5 answers · asked by caring_loveronstage 1

All POLITICAL PARTIES have supported in favour of CREAMY LAYER RESERVATION. Why?

What is this political system which care for only CREAMY LAYER?

There is no end to injustice. CORRUPTION, REGIONALISM, INCREASING POORS & PRICES OF ESSENTIALS ARE the proof.

ALL EXISTING PARTIES ARE WATCHING THE INTERST OF CREAMY LAYERS.

NONE CAN THINK FOR MERIT & MEANS.

NEW POLITICAL PARTY IS THE REQUIREMENT WHO CAN FOUGHT WITH CORRUPTION, RED TAPISM & WORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHARACTER, EDUCATION & EQUALITY.

EXISTING PARTIES ARE CONCERNED TO WATCH THE INTEREST OF CREAMY LAYERS. NEEDY & DEPRIVED IS NOT THERE CONCERN. THEY ARE DIVIDING THE SOCIETY & CHEATING THE COUNTRY.

DO U AGREE THAT INDIA NEEDS A NEW PARTY?

2006-12-25 01:51:12 · 12 answers · asked by anil a 2

Could I please appologise to you if I have offended you it was not my intention to do so I am sick of this 'arguing' I thought the idea of this type of communication was to communicate with each other but I see so much nastiness and I don't mean any of you directly.
Once again if I have offended I am sorry and it was not my intentionand I did not intend to cause any animosity between us all.

2006-12-25 01:03:10 · 3 answers · asked by polynesiachick 4

Here's but one example of someone who got caught up in 9/11.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061224/ap_on_re_us/attacks_material_witness

What gets to me about all this is if you read the news story, they act like there were actual hijackers and even that a plane hit the Pentagon when in fact, there is ZERO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of any of that being true. The propaganda machine just keeps on chugging out the same old story....

People, remember.....there is NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that a plane every hit the Pentagon. NONE. We are taking the word of George W Bush when we attack and kill Muslims for 9/11. Does that tell you anything?

2006-12-25 00:30:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 00:13:22 · 12 answers · asked by sajjad a 1

2006-12-24 23:27:30 · 4 answers · asked by neoconsmile 1

2006-12-24 23:24:36 · 11 answers · asked by neoconsmile 1

2006-12-24 23:09:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Nancy has already gone on record saying the regrab of power was on the top of the agenda and Harry Reid has publicly sided with the Bush recommendations of a temporary troop increase in Iraq...the idea here is is art now imitating life. You dont hear much about the no easy solutions with the liberally biased media and I thought this played clearly like a whacked out horror movie...with the minimum wage increase looming and the idea of a forced sick leave as an owner of a very small family business, im now facing the january takeover with one hand on my wallet and the other hand on the crack of my xxx as government clearly is in places that the free market should handle. does anyone else think this is good story line for a classic horror flick?

2006-12-24 22:43:25 · 6 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7

IS this a political propaganda ploy to push the nasty little homo secret on us all?

2006-12-24 22:24:59 · 15 answers · asked by neoconsmile 1

2006-12-24 22:07:51 · 3 answers · asked by average_andy_smith 1

2006-12-24 21:56:56 · 8 answers · asked by star 1

Whats wrong with Modern Civilization today is that people now a days have a over dose of sex in their mind which misleads them to thinking the wrong things.

72 virgins or 72 females who have already had sex?

It dosn't matter on the number of females a Man is going to meet in Heaven -- It matters what he does with him.

Just as I said in the first paragraph people have an over dose of sex in their minds.

So, obviously, people are going to judge the man's actions towards sex as soon as they hear the word Virgin.

Just because the Quaran may or may not state a Man will have 72 Virgins in Heaven does it mean he will have sex with all of them?

NO.

For one, why go to Heaven to have sexuall contact with 72 women?

A man could do what ever he wants with them, and it most likely dosn't have to do with sex.

He could make his own little town in Heaven, with animals and gardens and foods.

He could do what ever he wants but it dosn't have to be sex -- (continued)

2006-12-24 21:48:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Did you actually ever study the Quaran yourself? The actuall Quaran, not verses people post on websites.

Or do you actually know how a Muslim woman feels about wearing a Hijab or Mandeel by asking her yourself?

It bothers me how ignorant people are just to believe the first thing they read on blogs, YouTube, MySpace, Ect. and go on believing it until someone actually proves them wrong.

For example, The Verse Of The Sword ; Has anyone actually seen that Verse in the Quaran itself? Not google, or a website about the Quaran, or Yahoo Answers.

I've seen countless of false facts all over Yahoo Answers, take this for instance; Someone answered one of my previous questions saying "Muslims are gross because Men are promised 72 virgins in Heaven".

False - In Heaven Men (And woman alike) can have whatever they want, which now-a-days people have more sexest thoughts and rephrase the fact to "MEN CAN HAVE AS MUCH SEX AS THEY WANT IN HEAVEN"....

2006-12-24 20:50:41 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

The North Koreans can't free themselves, they're all brainwashed and afraid. I can't believe China protects this nutjob. The only reason he's still in power is because no one wants to invade. Is he going to start dropping bombs. Mostly, everyone's afraid China will defend him. No one wants a war with the two biggest super powers. But China thinks that if North Korea is liberated, the Americans will be too close, and they don't trust them. Isn't China letting the North Korean people down?

2006-12-24 20:36:51 · 3 answers · asked by puma 1

They dedicated the song"peaceful easy feeling".You can look this up.Does anyone know the relationship between the U.S. and Iraq in 1996?

2006-12-24 19:31:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

When they seem to be around each other 24/7?

2006-12-24 19:21:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-24 18:44:04 · 17 answers · asked by republican 2

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1731246/posts

Does anyone have a link refuting this?

2006-12-24 18:38:35 · 11 answers · asked by republican 2

2006-12-24 17:35:01 · 5 answers · asked by nitwit 1

countries,britein,french,russia,china,germany.please help me with this quetion,it's so very important.

2006-12-24 17:28:35 · 2 answers · asked by uni_tesfu2008 1

a.the founding fathers wanted to keep the common people from making a mistake b.they wanted to confuse the American people
c.they wanted a longer election period

d.none of the above

2006-12-24 17:27:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

a.president b.congress c.secretary of state d.chief justice

2006-12-24 16:47:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

a.senate b.house c.executive branch d.judicial branch

2006-12-24 16:27:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

In memory to one small part of human an immeasurable number of screw INNOCENT victims of murders in the world and the history!!!

with love
creatoremoderno

War and Economy are the same thing

2006-12-24 15:44:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-24 15:36:26 · 5 answers · asked by someguy 2

2006-12-24 15:22:08 · 12 answers · asked by Sulin07 2

2006-12-24 14:34:59 · 8 answers · asked by alvinbishop_01 1

...to end the war and bring the boys home and yadda, yadda, yadda?

2006-12-24 14:16:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-24 13:56:57 · 14 answers · asked by christians_r_evil_01 1