Can you give me a link to a website that proves that you don't have WMDs bruried in your backyard?
2006-12-24 19:42:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by bata4689 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Has any one got a link prooving that hussein did have WMDs apart from the US Intelligence which was feeding the world with wrong information. UN inspectors went to Iraq to search for those so called WMDs and found nothing. what's quite embarassing is the fact that even the Us Government had to change it's excuse for attacking Iraq, when they said that this war was to liberate the people of Iraq from the dictatorship of Saddam and to arm them with the power of democracy. Well guess what they failed to do even that (just like they had failed to find those WMDs) and Iraq is nothing but a complete failure for the Bush Administration.
2006-12-24 19:07:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Big Man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course he had them, and there is ample evidence and corpses that he used them. Poison gas for the most part. Still, we should not have toppled his government. Arab culuture cannot sustain any type of democracy, only theocratic dictatorships. You can't force freedom on people that don't want it badly enough to fight for it. We are wasting our lives and resources in Iraq. Iran will become a more attack worthy threat. And then it should be death from above, and NO rebuilding. Just leave the steaming, or glowing, as the case may be, mess lay.
The future? In 2008 Hillary or Obama will win. The middle class in the US will slow its slide to making the country achieve third world status. The military will become nearly non-functional under new military spending cuts, especially for statigic weapons. A WMD will be detonated in some US Eastern coastal city and the US military will lack the operational capacity under the Dems to respond. The US will have to respond with a tactical nuclear device ... talk about the cat being out of the bag then. I'm 44 now, and I fully expect a global nuclear exchange before I'm 60.
2006-12-24 19:28:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no proof because he did at least have biological & chemical WMD's and did in fact use them on his own people from 1980-1988 and up to 2001, destroying approximately 3000 villages and killing hundreds of thousands of people including women and children.
These included sarin, cyclosarin and mustard as well as anthrax & botulinim. He also developed a SCUD missile with sufficient range to carry these beyond Iraq's border into Israel and Saudi Arabia.
We also know he had plans to develop nuclear weapons, however that never came to fruition - fortunately.
I know it's not the information you were looking for but it is the documented truth. Be sure and check the link I've provided below and have a Merry Christmas...
2006-12-24 19:05:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well for starters bush rumsfeld and cheney were all on video stating they had fasle information on the wmd's. Thier videos can be found on youtube research. And trust this they would not want to say that if it wasnt true because it made all of them liars. Remember also in the 90's we sold Iraq weapons to fight in the iran iraq war. Then after that iraq tried to take over kuwait then we dismantled thier military completley. They had no means of attacking anyone. Thier people had just suffered over ten years of war and thier country was torn and tattered. So to think they had any weapons to threaten anyone is completely absurd. Almost as pathetic as a fox news broadcast.
2006-12-24 19:00:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
All known investigations, inspections and reports since the American Invasion of Iraq have provided the following information: No Known WMD's in Iraq.
2006-12-24 21:06:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sailinlove 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask the Kurds and Shiites in Iraq if he had them. Many thousands died by them. The information the world all agreed on said he had them. Somethings can never be proved or disproved. It is as simple as hating or believing in our President.
2006-12-24 22:15:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by meathead 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Un-Link your Common Sense from your blind loyalty to the GOP masterplan... and you will see you too have been played for a fool.
Here is the link that I use :
If Saddam had WMD's, he would have used them... (boy would he have used them).
If he left them with anyone, either they would have used them or he would be screaming to every ear about them.
How many nights in his spiderhole must he have cried "My kingdom for a WMD!!!".
2006-12-24 19:27:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jesus H. Zeitgeist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets change that just a bit, OK? Lets say you stold a box of cup cakes. The cops called and told you in 6 or 7 months or a year that they are going to come out and check your home for a box of missing cup cakes! Now don't you think in that time frame that you would eat them or toss them in the trash or send them to the neighbors kids or something to have them gone by the time the cops decided to come six months or better down the road?
Based on many Iraqi's this is what was done to those WMD's
Many don't want to believe this! Many have their own bias agenda's! In other words, it took them so long to get around to checking of course they were gone, only a total fool would have left them to be found!
2006-12-24 18:56:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Of course Hussein had wmd. Guess who sold them to him.
UNITED STATES ARMS SALES TO IRAQ: EXCERPTS OF RECENT CBS `60 MINUTES' BROADCAST (House of Representatives - January 31, 1991)
http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1991/C231.html
USA even found wmd in Iraq.
http://www.mrc.org/press/2006/press20060623.asp
Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/
Just further proof you can't trust what this government/mainstream media says.
2006-12-24 19:03:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋