Other - Politics & Government - September 2006

2006-09-08 03:04:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-08 03:00:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

scott sutton 9/27/69

2006-09-08 02:59:23 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-08 02:40:10 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Ask them to wait 10 years before they kill us? When good negotiates with evil, evil always wins...Peace follows victory, not words issued by diplomats."

Do you agree that some or all of this is true? Are there any assumptions you question?

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/eveningnews/main3420.shtml

2006-09-08 02:18:45 · 12 answers · asked by ? 5

These highly partisan Dem Senators - Shumer, Stabenow, Durbin and Dorgan - are claiming the ABC "Path to 9/11" which is based completely upon the 9/11 Commission report, to be inaccurate.

The ex-Clintonites are also whining about it. Is it because the truth undermines their claim to care about national security, or the myth that Clinton did anything to protect us?

These same people failed to condemn Dan Rather's 'fake but accurate' Bush AWOL partisan political hit piece based on fake documents and partisan lies. These people support the absurd claim that Bush lied. These people supported Joe Wilson's lies and the anti-Bush witch hunt for the revealer of Plame's identity.

Why should we believe they have integrity or support the truth now?
http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&

2006-09-08 02:03:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-08 01:51:10 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think everyone must admit that Bush is not an articulate man. Nor is he a man of vision. He has a great deal of trouble trying to get his ideas out to the public and always leaves his audience wondering exactly what is on his mind. This lack of articulation has caused a great deal of confusion in the country, which has led to all these wild notions that Bush is a Nazi warmonger.
I am not a Bush supporter. I never supported the idea of invading Iraq. In gleaming thru several of Bush's speeches, his underlying thought for invasion seemed reasonable: Iraq had in the past used its oil revenue to finance terrorism around the world. We are at war with terrorism. His notion seemed to be to topple the Iraqi government and replace it with a democratic government to deny terrorist revenue to wage their war.
That is certainly logical thinking. However, Bush's lack of vision prevented him from seeing the void in an Iraqi government would open the country to an extremists takeover. Iraq is now in danger of being taken over by a worst group of extremist. If these people take over the oil fields, they would have an unlimited supply of money to send suicide bombers into every shopping mall in America.
Bush's mishandling of Katrina pales in comparison to the bungling in Iraq. His lack of vision has led us into a hornet's nest. We cannot cut and run in Iraq. At this point, we must deny the extremists access to the oil fields. It's likely going to take a larger troop buildup and a draft to raise the army needed.
It's clear that Bush's notion of invading Iraq was aimed at beating terrorism. His lack of vision, however, has led us into a war that is going to cost many more American lives.

2006-09-08 01:42:17 · 18 answers · asked by Overt Operative 6

2006-09-08 01:11:39 · 32 answers · asked by geronemo 2

Should the goverment of Newfoundland and Police be alowed to murder you with the help of workers comp....You see they cut me off my hart pill witch i need for the rest of my life ..I told the police dept.and they did nothing..if you had a child and never gave them there hart pills i think it would be murder..killing off the disabled in Newfoundland with the help of the police..the stress it can cause can make you have a hart attack after haveing 2 caused by a walk in freezer freeon leak.at work...GOD...have mercey on the murders and there ways of dealing with the disabled...Amen.... +++

2006-09-08 00:29:53 · 5 answers · asked by DOGMA 2

It astounds me that the major mass media networks such as The New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, The Globe and Mail, NBC, CBS, CBC, Fox News etc. have failed to cover any stories relating to the mounting mass of evidence that indicates 9/11 was a state-sponsored cover-up. The amount of evidence is astounding. With hundreds of adept, accredited jouranlists just dying to cover this story being blantantly stone walled and ignored by these media outlets, it begs the question, "Is the media in-bed with the government?"

2006-09-08 00:14:37 · 19 answers · asked by Ciaran D 1

Now is 2 dangerous country North-Korea and Iran and maybe they have nuclear weapon is it possible the third world war start soon

2006-09-08 00:07:07 · 25 answers · asked by jrm_lkk 1

2006-09-08 00:01:59 · 8 answers · asked by D.Kumar 3

"We cannot trust ourselves to behave with decency - We cannot trust our consciences and the remedy is to elect a round body of our neighbours pretty much at random and say to those:

"Be ye our conscience make laws so wise and continue from year to year to administer them so wisely that they shall save us from ourselves and make us righteous and happy...."

Extracted from an essay by Robert Louis Stevenson - The Day After Tomorrow

2006-09-07 23:50:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 23:39:33 · 6 answers · asked by P-ney 1

The UK have spent several years testing out postal votes for local and general elections. The evidence is they have increased voter participation, but there is a negative perception that fraud is likely to happen.

What are your views on postal votes?

2006-09-07 23:22:28 · 13 answers · asked by thebigtombs 5

I live in a peaceful cul-de-sac in Watertown, MA. Two weeks ago my father was hit by a drunk driver (foul mouthed, a drugs addict, probably black) on our driveway. This almost destroyed our happy suburban life. Because of this the right side of my father's left foot is paralyzed for the rest of his life. My mother saw the disaster happen and since then, she can't come out of the house any longer because she's grown afraid of cars. Now I have to do all the grocery shopping. I wrote a letter to the city council, asking if they could forbid cars for two weeks in the streets surrounding our cul-de-sac. This would help her get used to the idea of leaving the house again. Would you believe the city refused to even consider it? Frankly I'm offended as a tax payer that practical considerations are superior to the delicate feelings of the citizen.

2006-09-07 23:02:26 · 4 answers · asked by AGoodPerson 2

I live in a peaceful cul-de-sac in Watertown, MA. Two weeks ago my father was hit by a drunk driver (foul mouthed, a drugs addict) on our driveway, probably black). This almost destroyed our happy suburban life. Because of this the right side of my father's left foot is paralyzed for the rest of his life. My mother saw the disaster happen and since then, she can't come out of the house any longer because she's grown afraid of cars. Now I have to do all the grocery shopping. I wrote a letter to the city council, asking if they could forbid cars for two weeks in the streets surrounding our cul-de-sac. This would help her get used to the idea of leaving the house again. Would you believe the city refused to even consider it? Frankly I'm offended as a tax payer that practical considerations are superior to the delicate feelings of the citizen.

2006-09-07 23:01:26 · 2 answers · asked by AGoodPerson 2

they got beautiful eyes hey they are not even slanted! they look just like those of beyonce's!!!

2006-09-07 22:14:52 · 12 answers · asked by NONAME 1

In short, after the American Revolution, our founding father did not found the Republic of America... they found the Monarchy of America instead!! What do you think would happen then? What kind of America and world we'd have today?

2006-09-07 22:05:38 · 7 answers · asked by Professor Franklin 4

PLEASE! This is just an unbiased question. I live in Cali and it just seems like theres more liberals out here than elsewhere in the country. Is there a specific reason for that?

2006-09-07 22:01:39 · 10 answers · asked by personal_trainer 2

2006-09-07 22:00:46 · 20 answers · asked by thebigtombs 5

everyone i know is out of work,collecting unemplyment or working less hours because things have been so slow. I guess to the REPUBLICANS and the new world order crowd this is progress. Say what you want things werent half as bad under CLINTON. oh yeah we should be happy about one thing though THEY SAY we are winning the fake war on terror? If you make an economy so bad that people,AMERICAN PEOPLE cant put food on the table isnt that also a form of TERROR??

2006-09-07 21:52:11 · 10 answers · asked by J S 1

2006-09-07 21:43:06 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Macedonia was divided in 1913. Macedonians that were still living in the part that greece took over were stripped of their human rights! Why? They had to change there last names and they were not allowed to speak the Macedonian language! Greeks changed names of cities,villages,lakes and rivers! Schools would teach greek! Macedonian language and names were wipe out!

2006-09-07 21:33:51 · 9 answers · asked by SOLUN macedonia 3

2006-09-07 21:21:41 · 5 answers · asked by Maganda 3

by the way where is the proof he stopped doing COCAINE? Does he take a drug test like the rest of most americans?

2006-09-07 21:18:48 · 10 answers · asked by J S 1

Moral authority is never retained by any attempt to hold on to it. It comes without seeking and is retained without effort.

2006-09-07 20:43:50 · 11 answers · asked by frogspeaceflower 4

What a load of rubbish? What can be done?

2006-09-07 20:13:55 · 9 answers · asked by R.I.P. 4

2006-09-07 20:10:14 · 12 answers · asked by msleggs39 2