These highly partisan Dem Senators - Shumer, Stabenow, Durbin and Dorgan - are claiming the ABC "Path to 9/11" which is based completely upon the 9/11 Commission report, to be inaccurate.
The ex-Clintonites are also whining about it. Is it because the truth undermines their claim to care about national security, or the myth that Clinton did anything to protect us?
These same people failed to condemn Dan Rather's 'fake but accurate' Bush AWOL partisan political hit piece based on fake documents and partisan lies. These people support the absurd claim that Bush lied. These people supported Joe Wilson's lies and the anti-Bush witch hunt for the revealer of Plame's identity.
Why should we believe they have integrity or support the truth now?
http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&
2006-09-08 02:03:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Notice all the discussion and news about this "entertainment event"?
Have you considered these politcal accusations may be a very clever approach by ABC to get lots and lots of free advertising for the show. So they can edit to to blandness now, and still get great ratings.
2006-09-08 09:38:33 · answer #1 · answered by Rjmail 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because people still believe this:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200407230005
Obviously, people will take a dramatization as truth as we seem to have issues with differentiating what is truth and what is fiction.
The blame does fall on Clinton, as well as every administration dating back to Carter and including Dubya. But should we make a fictionalized movie based on something so important?
How many more times are we going to ask this question today?
2006-09-08 02:08:30 · answer #2 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-08 03:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ABC does not have a "broadcasting license." The stations that broadcast ABC programming are licensed. And nobody is seriously threatening any station's license. This is simply a television program that mixes history, politics and drama, so it is very normal for people to express opinions about it, one way or the other.
Why don't you watch the broadcast before you make up your mind about it?
2006-09-08 02:12:43 · answer #4 · answered by pvreditor 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he's the standards chief! It became a brilliant deal that Jimmie wrecked. He lost over a hundred factors to 2d place. relatively of Jimmie clinching next week, he will probably could desire to attend until dwelling house. It relatively shaked up the standards standings. it extremely is not by way of fact he's Jimmie. If Paul Menard could have had a 184 ingredient lead, they could have performed the comparable subject to him. Plus Jimmie has gained 3 championships in a row. it relatively is going to be especially huge information whilst he loses one. i think of Dale Jr is the poster baby of Nascar. "look into the stands! no person is sitting down as Jr takes the lead!" Wait until JR wins his next race, if he does. you will see plenty greater exposure than Jimmie triumphing 4 championships in a row. dalejr4ever: you may desire to replace your profile suggestion considering that has Jimmie Johnson is unquestionably one of your popular drivers. i don't comprehend what made you regulate your innovations. You went from loving him to hating him over a twelve months span.
2017-01-05 05:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The usual spin from Democraps. They don't want the truth to come out, cry and whine is their best. It will blow Clinton's so-called legacy which is thin anyway right out of the water.
2006-09-08 02:40:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they are such stewards of freedom of the press. You remember how they howled at Fahrenheit 911, the Rather-not report and - oh wait, I forgot they didn't.
2006-09-08 02:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by Colorado 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Democrats are indignant and rightfully so. Bill Clinton is not at fault for George Bush's failures. Vote Democratic next time people, throw the GOP out.
2006-09-08 02:05:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Demon-crats are famous for the rewriting of history to reflect their perverted view of the world and their supposed importance in it. They are unable to tell the truth if you ask something as simple as is it hot or cold. Those in power in the current demon-cratic party are giving everyone of conscious in the party a bad name. Everything and every front runner among them just makes us laugh.
2006-09-08 02:08:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
How did the GOP deal with Michal Moore's film???
2006-09-08 02:07:26 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋