English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-17 04:02:07 · 12 answers · asked by garlic_n_wine 3

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/;_ylt=AgzZLjLk_1VWa2dfwqiFOuARzKIX

This guys campaigning more for "democratics" than the democrats are.

Must make you awfully proud to have such a supporter. Maybe you guys can get together at the next soldiers funeral and share some common likes and dislikes as you celebrate.

2006-06-17 03:17:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I got to know!

2006-06-17 03:09:55 · 15 answers · asked by Elizabeth V 1

2006-06-17 02:55:18 · 21 answers · asked by NONAME 1

2006-06-17 02:54:27 · 18 answers · asked by madriki_uk 1

2006-06-17 02:36:04 · 6 answers · asked by stvenryn 4

2006-06-17 02:28:02 · 12 answers · asked by louise r 1

2006-06-17 02:11:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D78B8615-917F-4A21-8E22-3C99E6E36D18.htm

Saturday 17 June 2006, 2:55 Makka Time, 23:55 GMT

An anti-Taliban offensive under way involves 10,000 personnel

At least 45 suspected Taliban have been killed in clashes in Afghanistan as the US-led multinational force continues its largest offensive since 2001.

islam plus american democratics to love only peace. no to american mr president bush and peoples war lover army killer(praise be to allah)

2006-06-17 02:05:29 · 12 answers · asked by NONAME 1

Thank you for your answers on the war in Iraq. I agree, with the majority of answers. How many of you feel that Saddam could have waited, for a few years, since there was no tangible evidence of weapons of mass destruction in evidence to the inspecters? Don't you think we would be better off, if the U.S. had waged an all-out war on the real terriorist? The real terriorist are still out there and they are the real threat, What a waste of taxpayers money and American lives, and for the wrong reasons.

2006-06-17 02:01:52 · 5 answers · asked by Deana 2

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

2006-06-17 01:49:24 · 11 answers · asked by raymond b 1

The First Amendment to the US Constitution grants us
Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, and
Freedom of and from Religion.
The Second Amendment grants us the RIght to Bear Arms.
When these conflict -- and they do -- how should we decide
what actions to take to protect every American's rights?

2006-06-17 01:07:27 · 4 answers · asked by David Y 5

2006-06-16 23:32:52 · 7 answers · asked by ali 1

2006-06-16 23:32:15 · 3 answers · asked by stillsmiling 1

I always see that International Security Councle do not have enough strength to force countries who attack others and killing inocents especially women & kids to obey the international laws and rules and to stop like these affensive acts , and some times I feel like that the ISC is supporting these countries by allowing them escape from the justice grip ?

2006-06-16 23:01:25 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the U.S., people at least know that there are more than two political parties that presently exist even if they also don't know what they truly are all about. It doesn't make any sense to keep going about each and every Presidential/ Vice Presidential election and pretend that there's only the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in existence in the United States. The Green Party, the Libertarian Party, the Constitution Party, the Reform Party, and other political parties also presently exist in the U.S. whether people like it or not. There are also sometimes situations where there are very strong independent candidates for Pres./V.Pres. as well with H. Ross Perot being one such example of this in 1992 and in 1996. At least, Mr. Perot was included in the debates in '92, and the media ratings were the highest ever because of his inclusion. What are the major political parties afraid of by not including others? More of the general public would pay attention to all of the debates!

2006-06-16 22:46:55 · 8 answers · asked by johnthebaptistmoore 3

Believing in women's empowerment is in no way hating men. Quite contrarily, when women have control over their lives and are not discriminated against, the men around them have much more enjoyable lives themselves. There is no reason why men should enjoy privileges that women don't. If you believe in a free and fair society, you must believe in people's empowerment. Gender equality does not mean sameness in identities but rather equity in terms of opportunities. If you have a mom, a sister, a daugther, female friends... surely you want them to live fulfilling lives, no?
The overwhelming majority of feminist are respectful and only want women's conditions to improve. Why do we bash people who want to make society better?

2006-06-16 22:42:58 · 15 answers · asked by justcopyandpaste 1

What exactly would satiate the blood hungry Americans how many more civilian deaths? how many more wars? What if citizens of America faced bombings like Iraqis, Japanese and Veitnamese have would they become terrorists or preach Gospel of peace?

2006-06-16 21:43:06 · 8 answers · asked by boogie man 4

I need finacial help and would like to apply for a government cash grant but don't know who to write to without paying for that info(I can't afford it)Can anyone out there help me with info???

2006-06-16 21:08:08 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

its like were doing all the work the pres picks up phone calls all day and says hello uh uh yea good bye come on people lets stand up and make them do some of the work that were supposed to do! the statue of liberty means fredom not work we already have jobs to do.

2006-06-16 19:40:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-16 19:27:21 · 3 answers · asked by Gillou 1

Everyone loves him, there can't be anyone against him. Right?

2006-06-16 19:25:56 · 34 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

fedest.com, questions and answers