Other - Politics & Government - June 2006

Just asking to see what you think.

2006-06-30 04:53:54 · 35 answers · asked by ♥mcmanda♥ 5

all those tapes of bin laden come from somebody, so why cant they just get the guy who brought the tape to the tv station, or follow him back to whereever he came from,, or is that to easy

2006-06-30 04:41:21 · 10 answers · asked by scottfamilytribe 3

i get social security survival benefits, and my monthly check has never been late. this month is my last check and it is late for the first time ever. did something happen with social security? is anyone else's check late? why?

2006-06-30 04:38:59 · 10 answers · asked by 1 Hott Mami 4

2006-06-30 04:31:03 · 4 answers · asked by mael333ca 2

What is Al Gore's scare tactic in terms of gobal warming and what would one hope to accomplish from the scare tactic. Can't be money or oil.

2006-06-30 04:19:09 · 8 answers · asked by Lou 6

The palestinien hamas have kidnapped an israeli 19 year old soildier and also kidnappes a 18 year old setteler whome they brutely murderd yesterday.
Now they are saying that the hamas have kidnapped another soildier.
i think that israel should totlay destroy anything that is of hisbalah and hamas and should not just sit peitienly and wait to get back a turtured corps from these animals.
what is your opinion

2006-06-30 04:17:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I watched the video on yahoo about getting rid of the penny, and they said that because the price of zinc, it now costs 1.3 cents to make a penny. I personally don't think that we should get rid of it. Just find another metal to make it, or the price of zinc may go down. So should we get rid of the penny?

2006-06-30 03:52:53 · 13 answers · asked by NM0758 2

2006-06-30 03:48:35 · 19 answers · asked by Report Abuse 3

The structure of the UN captures the reality of 1946. The world doesn't look like that anymore.
- why hasn't Germany and Japan been given a Security Council seat?
- why do regimes who stay in power by force of arms get a vote at all?
- Since they just sit on their butt regardless of the crisis, why do we pay any attention to them at all?

2006-06-30 03:41:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-30 03:34:02 · 12 answers · asked by ABIRIBA 1

2006-06-30 03:29:32 · 10 answers · asked by dasiemay 1

Personally I wouldn't get an invite although i am as British as the rest of them i am Roman Catholic and also a republican sympathiser who hates everything they stand for. Tiocaidh Ar La as someone of Irish desent I can empathise with currant asylum seekers even though they do get better treatment than my ancestors did! good luck to them.

2006-06-30 03:28:28 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

If I knocked up your daughter, what would you do?

2006-06-30 03:24:40 · 9 answers · asked by Evan 1

President G. W. Bush was rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91. The six Democrat presidents had IQs with an average of 156, with President Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126.

No president other than Carter (D) has released his actual IQ, 176.

Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President G. W. Bush, his low ratings were due to his apparent difficulty to command the English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents), his lack of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis. The complete report documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis.

2006-06-30 03:23:55 · 14 answers · asked by Lou 6

I am very curious of why. I was looking over the questions, and I noticed quite a few people believe we still live in patriarchal society. That is true for some countries - meaning dictatorial countries and countries where women are not allowed to vote - but in most countries patriarchy has in fact been dismantled. You see, in countries that are ran by constitutional monarchies and democracies are in fact not patriarchies for the countries are run by the people who vote, men AND WOMEN. Yes, patriarchies may be existent in some homes, but not in government. I am not a crazed feminist who is rooting for matriarchy. To be frank, I don't like either patriarchy or matriarchy I believe that I country, and household, can only be properly run by both sexes.

2006-06-30 03:22:12 · 13 answers · asked by balanced 2

Smoking is no more harmful than drinking and will the government ever put a ban on drinking? I doubt it. They say smoking harms other people around you but a lot of crime is committed under the influence so that's gotta be more harmful. You don't have a smoke and want to go out and take the world on and if you're smoking weed you're probably hiding behind the sofa in a state of paranoia so won't even leave the house! Don't you think the govenrment have got it all wrong as usual?

2006-06-30 02:25:02 · 19 answers · asked by Jimbo 2

2006-06-30 02:23:45 · 13 answers · asked by P. J 1

2006-06-30 02:14:38 · 12 answers · asked by Tom R. 1

good or acceptable behavior by certain people and that is fine. But please tell me how you feel about this. We can send our 18 year old "children" to war - the government does - BUT we feel these "children" are too young to smoke or drink. I UNDERSTAND THE SMOKING AND DRINKING THIS IS BAD BUT -- my point is ---- WAR IS WORSE. Why are they considered adults only when the government decides they want them to be? This just totally blows me away. They may not get addicted to alcohol and if they did get addicted to smoking-if they chose to smoke - they could try and quit but they can't say "I changed my mind" once in Iraq and facing a quick and furious death. If you say they "chose to go to the service" - ok that is fine but the government ALLOWS them to make this choice. See my point?

2006-06-30 01:58:09 · 10 answers · asked by butterfliesRfree 7

wasn't it a mistake to give John Hinkley an unsupervised day pass?

2006-06-30 01:44:25 · 6 answers · asked by kelleygaither2000 1

can qualify as foster parents. what is your view on that?

2006-06-30 01:19:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean really. He is promoting a very important subject, but he flies around the country in his private jet, takes limosines wherever he goes. What about flying commercial? To me, he may be one of the biggest hypocrits out there. What do you think?
Thanks

2006-06-30 01:14:45 · 10 answers · asked by BL1957 3

Why, do the democrats always pose this same Q? everytime they want back in office, (as with Jimmy Carter, as with "French Fry" Bill Clinton) and now with Al "Jab You" Gore? But when they are in office they seem to have forgotten the very question they have asked the American People?

2006-06-30 01:12:19 · 6 answers · asked by Ihatedems 1

2006-06-30 01:09:14 · 1 answers · asked by not_prfikt 7

2006-06-30 00:39:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Of course, this question can be reversed!

2006-06-30 00:31:58 · 6 answers · asked by ~dalux~ 3

2006-06-30 00:24:50 · 9 answers · asked by ___ãÑãhà 3

Is there something wrong with him, chemically?

2006-06-30 00:22:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-30 00:19:21 · 14 answers · asked by one_faithful_mo 3

if your answer is because to defend her self ,
defend herself from who?!
Does defending a country smaller than alot of citys need 700 nuclear bombs that can wipe the whole earth?!
why dont they let the world take a look of the nuclear works?
Why do they develop notronic bombs,proton bombs and a lot more of different kind of nuclear wepons that you havent heard about it?
They must be a very strong reason for the world to trust them.....

2006-06-30 00:11:15 · 8 answers · asked by m@mm@d n 1