Government - August 2006

It's clear why the white house does this but its a sign of a really weak press. The major netwroks/papers could tell the White house that they won't cover the president unless they can ask un-censored questions. Why don't they do thsi?

2006-08-17 00:00:33 · 5 answers · asked by softenthecorners101 2

2006-08-16 23:47:50 · 6 answers · asked by gilamichael 1

2006-08-16 23:44:17 · 1 answers · asked by poison_ivy_0301 1

2006-08-16 23:42:40 · 13 answers · asked by mana 1

2006-08-16 23:31:04 · 5 answers · asked by sipaloe 2

2006-08-16 23:14:26 · 4 answers · asked by Jim 1

2006-08-16 23:11:59 · 9 answers · asked by Jim 1

Does this, and punching that farmer with a mullet make up for years of idiocy and incompetence?

2006-08-16 23:03:39 · 14 answers · asked by Grinner5000 4

2006-08-16 23:02:08 · 12 answers · asked by Jim 1

2006-08-16 22:54:08 · 5 answers · asked by Jim 1

2006-08-16 22:47:48 · 5 answers · asked by Jim 1

The U.S. system of government has a good system of checks and balances until the sumpreme court is concerned, who holds them accountable. Their word is practicly law and they are free to rule any action unconstitutional at a whim.

2006-08-16 22:18:48 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is the implementation of this new law (5 working days) are required in all of the company in dubai? because our company says that we will still have 1 day off... where can i get a copy of this new law for them to know.. Thanks

2006-08-16 21:45:55 · 3 answers · asked by Heaven 1

2006-08-16 21:08:58 · 15 answers · asked by neel_tin 1

2006-08-16 20:39:47 · 11 answers · asked by Sanjay S 2

Whatever we think of our leaders and politicians, is it acceptable to use the C-word or any other form of swearing in public debates?

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article1219716.ece

2006-08-16 20:25:30 · 24 answers · asked by Nothing to say? 3

or is it just unfair to us civilians.

2006-08-16 20:15:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are both models of society that the leaders of the respective countries professed to believe in and they both violently imposed this on other countries.

2006-08-16 20:09:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

In 2000 military voters were denied their right to vote, 2004 minorities in Ohio and Florida were striped of thier right to vote. How will we prevent the actions of the past, and even if we can will it be worth it?

2006-08-16 19:54:56 · 14 answers · asked by passghost 2

I.Q around 55 what u think?

http://www.cutepiggy.com/george_w_bush.html

2006-08-16 19:47:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-16 18:44:21 · 13 answers · asked by manoharan r 1

coming? What are they up to now?

2006-08-16 18:36:58 · 19 answers · asked by Ned B 1

I think Yahoo is working directly for the US Government. I think they are spying on all of us, reporting EVERYTHING we ask or say that is in opposition to the evil goals of our current regime, and HIDING the really hardcore questions that draw attention to the farce they are a part of perpetuating.

2006-08-16 18:31:56 · 5 answers · asked by evilposterchild 2

2006-08-16 18:28:52 · 35 answers · asked by one 4

Bonnett, Bonatte, I have no real idea. All I really know is that this latest revelation is being used to try and make people think that invading our rights as FREE PEOPLE is somehow OKAY. The media is playing this little girls death like a musical instrument. They are going off. They use the word "sex" when they speak of this like they use the word "terrorist" as they try to convince us that our own government wasn't behind 911.

NOT TO MENTION the fact that NOW, the media is doing everything it can to make the parents look totally innocent.

LMFAO - STUPID bull$hit. How funny the media/government is to just a single open eye.

2006-08-16 18:18:58 · 6 answers · asked by evilposterchild 2

Are you sick of our government paying disability social security to people who CHOOSE to drink and take drugs?

Where is the PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY?

2006-08-16 18:17:24 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't think it's good for ANY country to buy into this global dependence in our markets, not for food, not for oil, not for any resources which a country needs for survival. And I just got a response on another question i asked about "Borders" - he says that it's about "globalization"... That's scary, buddy. If we lose our United State identity, we lose the constitution, we lose our soveriegnty to elect leaders of our LOCAL choice, we lose EVERYTHING! There's no guarantees that the new world order will offer you the same freedoms as we still are clinging to today - Look how difficult it is to get anything done with just our own state senators and system of govt. Do you think a representative govt (if we're that lucky) from all nations of the world will get anything done at all? The new world order is a sham, and should never be allowed to come about!!! Defend your freedoms! Defend America! Defend sovereignty!

2006-08-16 17:34:50 · 5 answers · asked by jdfehrenbach 1

just curious

2006-08-16 17:18:30 · 12 answers · asked by Ricky S 2

What are they?

2006-08-16 17:16:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I personally would have preferred Kerry in office in the first place but I cannot figure out how he got a 2nd term. What is he out for? Cleaning up with daddy couldn't finish?

2006-08-16 16:59:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous