Government - July 2006

2006-07-19 19:49:42 · 1 answers · asked by zsarisse a 1

2006-07-19 19:22:09 · 7 answers · asked by SuperGirls™ 5

2006-07-19 19:19:03 · 5 answers · asked by SuperGirls™ 5

Will his decision stop stem cell research. Are his reasons valid?

2006-07-19 19:11:35 · 10 answers · asked by miraclerun123 2

Let's get it on...

2006-07-19 18:48:48 · 28 answers · asked by Killer 3

They chose to vacation or live there, and they knew it was dangerous, so why should our tax dollars pay to remove them?

2006-07-19 18:40:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

ok this is not a question but its just been proved that the AMERICAN goverment was behind the whole of 9/11...you really shud see it...go t google and type 'in loose change2nd edition' and then send it t ur friends if u want ur contry back! btw g.bush's brother was involved too...:)

2006-07-19 18:17:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-19 18:13:31 · 6 answers · asked by tough as hell 3

recently india government not allowing his people to access some blog site, anyone know the reason?

2006-07-19 18:02:20 · 1 answers · asked by deval_agrifarman 6

Do you guys really think that we went to war for control of oil and if so, where is that control? Also all of you remember your thoughts the morning of Sept 11th? I did not run across one person that did not think we should go to war. Soon as the war took over a month people started to complain. Guess what America, War takes time and money ( Alot of both) and yes bloodshed of people good and bad. Saddam was a problem that would have been dealt with regardless. Stop Blaming Bush. Be proud your American. Do not belive the media , its way more crooked than any president ever was....

2006-07-19 17:55:41 · 19 answers · asked by meastt 1

This Valerie Plume thing has me wondering...

Also, can you cite source. Thanx.

2006-07-19 17:49:28 · 3 answers · asked by sfox1_72 4

2006-07-19 17:44:16 · 6 answers · asked by professionalfemale01 3

i think its messed up it takes away so much hope from people with life threating diseases.

2006-07-19 17:42:24 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-19 17:39:26 · 12 answers · asked by hariiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1

2006-07-19 17:38:04 · 2 answers · asked by Megan Z 1

I believe Russia and China will form a secret alliance to destroy our country. Both of these countries are powerful, dangerous, and despise the western world. The chinese control most of our American ports and Russia has countless nuclear weapons. Together, they could secretly import nukes into every major city on our coastlines and America could be put into an extreme state of vunerability. We would have no choice but to surrennder and hand over our arms to the enemy. Checkmate.

2006-07-19 17:11:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-19 17:02:38 · 8 answers · asked by j h 2

why or why not? im just curious

2006-07-19 16:55:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

List everyone you think may run, and then pick a winner. Thanks

2006-07-19 16:52:35 · 10 answers · asked by borisovna7 2

OK, i'm really sick of the president questions here so heres one more for you that dont get it.,

2006-07-19 16:46:08 · 15 answers · asked by jim galaxy 1

2006-07-19 16:20:17 · 9 answers · asked by klarf 3

what do you think about President Bushs "slip up" during open mike to tony blair?

2006-07-19 16:16:11 · 11 answers · asked by bassrocker416 3

Go to this question and look at the last answer. It's the one by Legend2300. I'll give best answer to whoever tells the best story of this guys childhood and what traumatic incidents led him down the path of duh...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=20060704141108AA8xmJp

2006-07-19 15:48:06 · 9 answers · asked by Dognose0 2

microsoft is taken over by the goverment, communist enclaves gathers homeless, prisoners, poor, and unemployed and put them to productive use---they need to fill the quota to live in the communist enclave communities or back to capitalist slums----..

basically socialist components integrated into our economy...lets have an open mind....

the set defined winners of markets can often act selfishly---why not, once a winner becomes apparent, take over with the goverment and enforce for general benefit---then when another industry emerges or new players that are more efficient emerge to compete, sell back to the markets, and let the winner loose, one another winner becomes set, repeat the process...

furthermore, most money goes back in the third generation, (inheritance), enough to make them live well, but the excess (like paris hilton excess) goes back to the goverment...and land goes back in 70 years...ensuring equality yet giving enough incentive--stability +economy.

2006-07-19 15:45:01 · 2 answers · asked by jack d 1

2006-07-19 15:36:24 · 12 answers · asked by foy hor 2

2006-07-19 15:33:02 · 15 answers · asked by Hot Aviator Glasses 2

Do Americans raised in an atmosphere of at least 125 years of increasing government-sponsored nannydom have anything remotely in common with the founders of the United States? Would they be willing to revolt against a tyrannical government -- or are all of us too dependent upon it now that we will take whatever it does -- or use it to take whatever WE can from our fellow Americans?

2006-07-19 15:31:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is for all the "love it or leave it" Bubbas out there. Considering every square inch of the earth is claimed by governments, and none of the nations of "civil society" are actually free (and thus there is nowhere to go even if I DID want to go), why should those of us on the receiving end of any given Nanny State intrusion just accept it because the intruders are too lazy to think a complete thought? Last time I checked, my life isn't a blank check for anyone else!

2006-07-19 15:26:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-19 15:23:44 · 14 answers · asked by Shannon 2

2006-07-19 15:15:27 · 20 answers · asked by kerr to u 2