Should the US government charge the US citizens being evacuated from Lebanon?

Question

They chose to vacation or live there, and they knew it was dangerous, so why should our tax dollars pay to remove them?

To Roy E. - if they didn't know that the Middle East was a dangerous area then they are a stupid as you are!

Answer 1

I like that question, They wanted to be there. They knew what was ahead. I am all for united but don't make mistakes and expect others to pay for it.

Answer 2

it is the regulation it truly is on the books, in case you get repatriated by technique of Uncle Sam you owe Uncle Sam. commonly Bush receives bashed for ignoring the regulation, no longer searching at it! it is compared to they're soliciting for the money up the front or do a approach examine, and $2 hundred is seems particularly life like for what they're getting. If someone is there operating for Bechtel or in spite of employer it type of feels particularly life like that the business enterprise reimburse the taxpayers for the journey. distinctive the different human beings in Lebanon may be coming living house after summer holiday journeys after all, so the weren't making plans on a free journey living house. they could get refunds on the go back parts of their airplane tickets and then settle up with the State branch. i don't understand that the reaction is so sluggish. Lebanon is a former colony of France so it is organic that they could flow better immediately there. it type of feels to me like the State dept. and the protection rigidity are doing the very ideal they could lower than the circumstances.

Answer 3

That's a tough one because I do see your point BUT some of them are losing homes, etc... difficult to decide.

It reminds me of houses on the beach then a hurricane comes and the government picks up the check for fixing them.

So, I think they should have to pay something. Yes, I am sympathetic at any loss they might endure but like you said, they knew it was dangerous over there.

Answer 4

When Israel first began bombing Lebanon President Bush asked for and got a delay so repairs could be made to the run way for three flights to take place....then afterward the bombing resumed.So logically the questions follow who were these people on these three flights?If he had the power to make Israel stop then why not now?Why do we put up with this kind of crap from Bush?

Answer 5

Well, it's hard to say, but they did put themselves there. That makes a strong argument for them paying. It's not really comparable to Katrina because that happened in the US. I would say that for sure any one who gripes publicly on the news should be charged. People should not be so dependent on the government anyway.

Answer 6

For the same reason our tax dollars gives welfare to perfectly capable (but lazy) people.

It does however show how much America cares for people of its nationality or citizenship in some cases. I see it as a good thing.

Answer 7

Yes, as you stated, they CHOSE to be there. The State Department has Lebanon on the list of countries not recommended to visit. There fore, if you walk into a bullet storm, you deserve to be shot.

Answer 8

NO, we need to stand and support each other, remember, united we stand, divided we fall. This a time of crisis, and money is money but human lives are more precious. Especially American lives, too much of us have perished.

Answer 9

I think they should be evacuated immediately and billed later if they are vacationing or working there. If they are government employees, it should be free.

Answer 10

It wasn't dangerous when they went there. No they shouldn't be charged to be evacuated.