microsoft is taken over by the goverment, communist enclaves gathers homeless, prisoners, poor, and unemployed and put them to productive use---they need to fill the quota to live in the communist enclave communities or back to capitalist slums----..
basically socialist components integrated into our economy...lets have an open mind....
the set defined winners of markets can often act selfishly---why not, once a winner becomes apparent, take over with the goverment and enforce for general benefit---then when another industry emerges or new players that are more efficient emerge to compete, sell back to the markets, and let the winner loose, one another winner becomes set, repeat the process...
furthermore, most money goes back in the third generation, (inheritance), enough to make them live well, but the excess (like paris hilton excess) goes back to the goverment...and land goes back in 70 years...ensuring equality yet giving enough incentive--stability +economy.
2006-07-19
15:45:01
·
2 answers
·
asked by
jack d
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
if we had a socialist united party all the way through, instead of this gay *** campainging in the US, with its flip-flop tactics, maybe we could actually respect our leaders....
China has it, that's the problem of democratic campaigning, you never have any continuity and stability, and furthermore, you veto things jsut for political capital instead of DOING WHAT IS BEST FOR OUR PEOPLE...
that's the real reason bush made that decision on vetoing stem cell research, political capital, because HE NEEDS TOO IN The helpless humiliated ridiculous enviroment of american politics now.
seriously, who can seriously even be respected if they think of respecting those sleazy scum?
a united party at least can do what is best for the people with a united party....hey, the yget corrupt? kick them out of office..checks and balances...you don't need two shitheads and two crappy parties to acheive democracy.
2006-07-19
17:29:09 ·
update #1