I think tapering with the life cycle of anything like animals and especially humans.. is just way to crazy. Yeah the Science says it is great for mankind and diseases, plus cure alot of stuff. But ask what ever happen to prayer and faith. Its amazing what that does. I seen it first hand with my eldest son. No science, medical, doctor could have predicted how he overcame his conditions. So I am against cloning of any kind. Faith and Prayer is a powerful petition for mankind.
And I know probaly not a favored answer on here... =)
2006-07-19 19:36:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cloning human?
If there are no byproduct like more embryos that you flush or use in other experiments and if he has all the rights as any other human being, in the court of law an outside, then yes.
If cloning is only production of spare parts, or slaves or any other meanining which does not give him fully rights of his body and functions ( like cloning with some patents) and freedom in society without stigmathen I feel extreme negative against any attempt , and would fight for their freedom.this woul be extremly unethicaly and agiains any religius beleifs about life.
Animals,there should also be some rights and borders , like pain tolerance, making living weapons, raising inteligence , patenting, I would not be so dramatic as with humans ,but there must be some ethical comitee who will overview that kind of stuff.
2006-07-19 19:31:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by haruvatu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, there are a form of meanings to the be conscious 'soul'. the only you modern in a dictionary isn't the only which each and each and every individual is utilising even as they say that stupid ingredient. They propose a ghostly spirit that does your wondering and feeling and lives on continually after demise. even as human beings say that your soul is going to heaven, they propose this ghostly ingredient, no longer the "reason behind existence." for sure there is no such ingredient; it is completely mythical. You do improve a difficulty for those individuals once you talk about that animals experience soreness. The logician Descartes became stricken by technique of this, considering he concept it took a soul to experience soreness, and so he denied that they quite felt soreness or exhilaration or some thing else, they purely acted like they did. They were, in his view, no longer some thing yet furry robots.
2016-12-01 23:35:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In simple form? You would be breeding soulless entities. No religious diatribe, just a statement for the main reason not to do it.
2006-07-20 15:31:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by amartouk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
pretty one,
Didn't you learn our creator's universal laws on crossing of all living things on planet earth.
Observe what Dr. Jekyll,Mr. Hyde did to all living things and what went wrong out there on planet earth.
How woman became manly and the man became sissy on planet earth.
Go ahead and mess around with our creator out there.
Notice who is coming to town to do the auditing on planet earth.
With extra ordinary power of punishment and destruction of human errors with earth, wind, fire, water and plagues on planet earth.
2006-07-19 19:46:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋