Another 'problematic' attack on Mike Huckabee.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7401.html
Headline:
"Huck's gift-givers ended up in state posts"
Subtext:
"Most of the posts Huckabee’s benefactors landed were on unpaid boards and commissions. Not all of the gifts came before the appointments — several came from old friends and there’s no clear evidence of any quid pro quo."
Unpaid posts? Not exactly sinister here... ;)
Question: Despite two weeks of attacks, Huckabee's numbers have only steadily increased. So the question is....
Are the attacks helping him in some way? Have the focus on ridiculous issues (AIDS, rapist, 'bribes') rather than more problematic concerns (taxes), only made Huckabee look better?
Or is he rising despite these attacks(Poor performance from competition)?
Please no "I hate Huck" or "I love Huck." Looking for an analysis on a debatable issue. Will report inappropriate responses.
2007-12-14
15:08:15
·
4 answers
·
asked by
MacGyver
3