Elections - December 2007

if on the day of the primary, the state is hit by a blizzard and a state of emergency is declared. What happens?? Is there a snow date for the primary if it cannot be held as scheduled? or, is it held, no matter what happens??

2007-12-22 17:15:34 · 5 answers · asked by TedEx 7

WHY?

Help me to decide Please.

2007-12-22 17:07:25 · 26 answers · asked by Mickeytopdog 3

2007-12-22 16:42:28 · 8 answers · asked by Over The Rainbow 5

2007-12-22 16:41:22 · 13 answers · asked by solaifasade 1

... regularly, and 87% of web users use it primarily for news & info on government??

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aainternet.htm

2007-12-22 16:38:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

should the Italian congress win the election in india next year or should Hindustan party of BJP win?

2007-12-22 16:32:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

1- Huckabee 2- Hillary 3- Rosie O. 4-Micheal Moore 5-Ron Paul
6-Bush 7- Billy Gramhan-8-Mitt Romney-9-Obama 10-Nancy P

Just for Fun

2007-12-22 16:07:49 · 14 answers · asked by Bee Bee 7

2007-12-22 16:07:21 · 14 answers · asked by hbsizzwell 4

if he became vice president after his second term and something happened to the president could he become president again

2007-12-22 15:30:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't care what anyone says, I'm voting for Hillary. Anyway I found an interesting video stating that only 44% of americans said they won't vote for Hillary and they listed the top 10 reasons why people have said they won't vote for her. I would like to know if you agree with this and what is your reason for not voting for her. I think she would make a fine president.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbhl4Ek5wKY

2007-12-22 14:43:48 · 19 answers · asked by UCLA kid, Go BRUINS!!! 1

Why or why not? it seems to me that America should have come far enough to vote for anyone of any religion.

2007-12-22 14:41:46 · 16 answers · asked by MRAMERICA 2

I find now he voted for bush and when i say he wrong to do that and his people spouse to vote for democrats he call me idiot . I now bush is so bad because of the wars and stuff but he wont lessen when I tell him .

2007-12-22 14:27:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-22 13:33:16 · 18 answers · asked by imback_missme 5

This year, i think I'm not going with my standard "Donald Duck" I'm thinking Santa would be a great moral standard, or even the tooth fairy. Anyone is better than Hillary.

2007-12-22 13:31:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will they find a stupid way like they did with Bill? Or will they let it slide like the Democrats and doing wth George W?

2007-12-22 13:11:23 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-22 12:53:45 · 11 answers · asked by D C 4

What mainstream journalist has the guts to ask the little darling hard questions?

2007-12-22 12:53:01 · 16 answers · asked by mountaindew25 3

In these three areas -- religion, wealth and power -- Liberals show us that their aim is to reduce us all to the lowest common denominator. Many years ago, I read Kurt Vonnegut's 1961 short story, "Harrison Bergeron." The story took place in a future time in which, as the story begins, "everybody was finally equal." Those deemed too intelligent were fitted with devices to interrupt their thoughts. Those thought too graceful or strong were forced to wear weights to slow them down. The faces of those who were too beautiful disappeared behind masks. No greater horror could await mankind than a world in which everyone is reduced to the lowest common denominator instead of being encouraged to be the absolute best they can be. Yet that, it turns out, is precisely what Liberals want.

2007-12-22 10:49:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Most of us realise that anyone not afraid of hard work has a chance to do well. This is especially true in America, where the only limits are one's own ambition and ability. Liberals love the progressive tax system, which takes a greater percentage of your money as you earn more. It's not fair that you should have more money than others, so your money should be forcibly redistributed to those who make less, in terms of government-run programs and services. With all the loopholes in our Byzantine tax code, however, the truly rich hardly pay at all. Theresa Heinz-Kerry, wife of the Democratic candidate for President in 2004, paid an effective tax rate of only 12.4% in 2003. Her reported income for that year was over five million dollars -- and that's just what her highly-paid accountants couldn't hide in tax shelters most Americans could never afford. That's a far lower rate than the average American pays... and the average American is worth quite a bit less than a million dollars.

2007-12-22 10:45:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Liberals are dedicated to the Marxist idea that there's a finite amount of wealth in the world. That's why they insist on punishing "the rich" (which can be defined as "anyone with a job") for having too much money. If you have more money than you need, they feel, you are somehow keeping the excess from someone else who needs it. Liberals like the idea that everyone should end up with the same amount of money after taxes redistribute the wealth from top to bottom. However, there would be no incentive whatsoever to work harder, better or faster than you absolutely need to, or to improve yourself in any way, if you end up with the same result no matter what. That's why China, North Korea and Cuba need men with guns to control their own population, as the USSR once did. But try explaining that to a Liberal.

2007-12-22 10:42:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Better chances of winning multiple lotteries than two presidents from the Bush family and possibly two from the Clinton's.

Why is this happening? Does it go back to the royal family idea from England?

2007-12-22 10:36:49 · 11 answers · asked by wondering 4

Do you think they would get a little shaky if someone started investivgating them for illegal drug use?

2007-12-22 10:18:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

She wants to stop the war, and save the environment

2007-12-22 10:14:10 · 8 answers · asked by Girly Q 4

2007-12-22 09:58:51 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Marijuana and cocaine are known to have backflashes later on in life so do we want a man with his finger on the button to be a admitted supposedly x drug user?

2007-12-22 09:54:59 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is my guess: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4HjsZqOaQ0

2007-12-22 09:50:43 · 10 answers · asked by ? 6

2007-12-22 08:58:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I keep seeing people say they will write in Ron Paul or whomever they want to win when they vote. but I have never seen a option to write in anything on our ballots in Oklahoma. I wonder how many have the "write-in" option.

2007-12-22 08:19:22 · 4 answers · asked by Manbearpig 3

There was a day, no American would doubt dems would cease being patriotic because they didn't have political power. No one would doubt that a democratic President would not lead the way to defend the USA if we were attacked, prior to 1980 or so.

If Gore had stolen the election in 2000 (God knows he tried hard) would anyone believe that Gore would have ordered the military to go after the Taliban in Afghanistan? No, Gore would have talked BIG but at the end of the day he would have deferred to the United Nations.

Most republicans feel socialists and communists have hi-jacked the democratic party. I can only think of a handfull of democrats that could be relied upon to defend the USA if they were in charge. Joe Lieberman is one of those few.

You can say Bush erred going into Iraq or republicans have allowed the religous right to get way too entrenched in their party & I would agree but the cancer of socialism is infested in the democratic party & dems are embracing it.

2007-12-22 08:06:17 · 17 answers · asked by ? 7

You can read the transcript or see Michelle Malkin's comments. I don't think its smart to attack the most popular and respected talk show host in the country. Rush normally doesn't go after republicans in the primary, so this is very strange.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/21/mike-huckabee-the-anti-limbaugh-candidate/

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_122007/content/01125106.guest.html

2007-12-22 07:57:48 · 13 answers · asked by Tommy 2