Elections - November 2007

2007-11-03 19:02:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

My name is - and I am running for Student Council. I am
dedicated, responsible, and enthusiastic. These are three words that describe me, and three reasons why you should vote for me. I cannot promise that if I am elected we will be allowed to chew gum or have no homework. But I can listen to what you, the students have to say, and pass it on to the faculty. I will try my best to meet any student requests. If that isn’t good enough, then I am not the person to elect. The only promise I can make is that I will try my hardest to help you, the students, have a memorable school year. Some ideas I have to improve the school are: more fundraisers. I believe that I am qualified to represent our school because I get good grades.


I feel as though I would be a good representative for the Mrs. Robinson’s class because I listen to everyone’s opinion and make intelligent decisions that would benefit the class and the school as a whole. If I am elected, I will try to make Highland Creek Ele

2007-11-03 17:27:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

just curious, I found it got much worse after he got in the second time

2007-11-03 16:40:53 · 46 answers · asked by lukesss_0 1

seriously. i mean he has a great presence but, what does he plan to do, where does he stand on issues like immigration, health care, global warming, and the war??

2007-11-03 16:24:12 · 9 answers · asked by Rachel 2

Who are you looking to win next year in the presidential race and why

2007-11-03 14:17:22 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 14:00:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

platforms meaning the party's goals, principals, etc for each...and plz include bibliographies too...thanx!!

2007-11-03 13:24:09 · 11 answers · asked by amna s 2

Are we being sold a lie!

2007-11-03 11:59:40 · 26 answers · asked by insert_ nickname_ here! 5

Ok, I am so confused. I am an independent that seems to follow the democrats lately. I am very discouraged in the candidates we have to follow or the ones that are leading in the polls... the last debate brought Joe Biden to my attention and I liked what I saw and heard from him.

My question is this.... I don't seem to be swept away like so many other people for Barack Obama. I hear all the time "I love the way he leads" " We need someone like him to lead" What are they basing this on? I cannot think of one thing that I have heard him lead on (anymore then any of the other candidates) and didn't know if you all can fill this in for me.

To me, we have already hired someone two times that wasn't from Washington and someone that was considered new and fresh to politics when he was first elected.... that person was George Bush and that didn't turn out too well. So why should we be looking for new and fresh again?

2007-11-03 11:26:34 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

10 points for the person with the most persuasive response that doesn't badmouth anyone else.

2007-11-03 10:54:26 · 14 answers · asked by chemcook 4

2007-11-03 09:40:27 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

State your candidate and why.

2007-11-03 07:31:24 · 16 answers · asked by Star 3

Will another Clinton fix another Bushwhacked Economy

2007-11-03 07:27:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I wonder if Reagan and Carter are loons too?

2007-11-03 06:29:52 · 14 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

What keeps them alive? Why do citizens join and support them?

2007-11-03 06:11:01 · 8 answers · asked by Danny 2

Who looks best able to do that?

2007-11-03 05:25:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

He was at a FUND RAISER for Hillary, in Great Britan. Do we have fundraisers for people running for our President in other countries?

2007-11-03 04:59:58 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 04:47:37 · 9 answers · asked by callAspadeAspade 2

2007-11-03 04:27:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so, which state are you in?

I'm in NJ and I'm going to GRIP(Get Rid of Incumbent Politicians) this election.

2007-11-03 04:26:31 · 4 answers · asked by findandreplace 3

He has enormous support from internet people. I believe he
can whip her 10-1.

2007-11-03 04:16:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

He has been criticizing Hillary for her vote in favor of labeling the Iranian National Guard a terrorist organization, but interestingly enough Barack Obama never showed up to make that vote, when all the other candidates at the debate did, never spoke against until the vote was already, and now we find out he held the same position as her?

“Who said this?
“Such a reduced but active presence will also send a clear message to hostile countries like Iran and Syria that we intend to remain a key player in this region.” Later in the same speech, he said: “Make no mistake, if the Iranians and Syrians think they can use Iraq as another Afghanistan or a staging area from which to attack Israel or other countries, they are badly mistaken. It is in our national interest to prevent this from happening.”
George Bush? Nope.
The latest from Dick Cheney? Guess again.
Language from Kyl-Lieberman? Sorry.
That was Senator Obama in late 2006 making the case for why maintaining a military force in Iraq is necessary to constrain Iran's ambitions. But that was then.
This is now: Stagnant in the polls and struggling to revive his once-buoyant campaign, Senator Obama has abandoned the politics of hope and embarked on a journey in search of a campaign issue to use against Senator Clinton. Nevermind that he made the very argument he is now criticizing back in November 2006. Nevermind that he co-sponsored a bill designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a global terrorist group back in April. Nevermind that his colleague from Illinois – Dick Durbin – voted the same way as Senator Clinton on Kyl-Lieberman and said “If I thought there was any way it could be used as a pretense to launch an invasion of Iran I would have voted no.”
Today, in order to justify his opposition to Kyl-Lieberman, Senator Obama says that such language is bellicose and gives the President a blank check to take the country to war.
But if Senator Obama really believed this measure gave the President a blank check for war, shouldn’t he have been in the Senate on the day of the vote, speaking out, and fighting against it? Instead he did nothing, remained totally silent, skipped the vote and spoke out only after the vote”

From Msnbc


And btw, I am not supporting Hillary Clinton..

2007-11-03 04:11:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Republicans will be on the back burner for the next 8 years. Does this worry the Republicans?

2007-11-03 04:10:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

DEMOCRAT COMMUNIST PARTY JUST KEEPS LYING......IT WAS THE DEMOCRATS THAT FOUGHT TO KEEP BLACKS IN SLAVERY AND PASS THE DISCRIMINATORY BLACK CODES AND JIM CROW LAWS. IT WAS THE DEMOCRAT THAT STARTED THE KU KLUX KLAN. IT WAS THE DEMOCRATS THAT STOOD IN THE DOOR WAY OF THE SCHOOL TO KEEP BLACKS OUT!....MARTIN LUTHER KING FOUGHT THE DEMOCRATS THAT STOOD IN THE DOOR WAY OF THE SCHOOL....."MARTIN LUTHER KING WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN A DEMOCRAT"!...IT WAS PRESIDENT DWIGHT EISENHOWER WHO PUSHED TO PASS THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957......IT WAS NOT HARRY TRUMAN, HE WAS ALSO FOR SEGREGATION......DEMOCRATS ARE OUT RIGHT LIARS!! IN 1991 DAVID DUKE TRIED TO RUN ON THE REPUBLICAN TICKET AS A FAVOR TO THE CLINTON'S, THIS WAS HOW BILL CLINTON WAS ABLE TO BECOME PRESIDENT....."DAVID DUKE IS A HARD CORE DEMOCRAT"! AND DAVID DUKE IS A LONG TIME FRIEND OF THE CLINTON'S AND STILL PART OF THE KLAN! MARTIN LUTHER KING WAS A PROUD REPUBLICAN AND WOULD BE PROUD OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TODAY!

2007-11-03 04:09:36 · 4 answers · asked by ? 3

2007-11-03 03:56:57 · 7 answers · asked by Arnold M 1

It's fair to say illegals do the hard work that welfare people refuse to do; is this obvious disparity a motivating factor why liberals want illegals to become citizens and learn the lesson of other exploited minorities, living off the government is a better way of life & you have no chance to improve your life, in a capitalistic society.

Sure, the primary reason libbies want illegals to have citizenship is to vote democratic BUT maybe it takes a generation or two, to kill that "hard work" thing that embarasses liberals (it proves people can overcome hardships on their own without requiring government to pay you to stop working).

2007-11-03 03:16:58 · 5 answers · asked by ? 7

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/11/open-mouth-inse.html#more

2007-11-03 02:47:37 · 2 answers · asked by Ron L 4

Would you like to vote yourself a raise.

2007-11-03 01:34:36 · 18 answers · asked by ken s 5

un-American thought process you can have?

Are you people serious??

2007-11-03 01:00:02 · 10 answers · asked by idontknow 3

I wouldn't put it past him to try to pull something like this. I heard rumors that he was trying to make it to wear a president could be in office for more than two terms but saw nothing to confirm this. If you have any articles on this they would be appreciated. I pray he doesn't try this. 1/20/09 BUSH'S LAST DAY!...It'd be nice if he was impeached and thrown out of office before then.

2007-11-03 00:34:08 · 28 answers · asked by UpTheDownwardSpiral 3