Elections - October 2007

They started the war with us when Clinton was president and they attacked us many times. Clinton tried to play it off and negotiate. His liberal strategy didn't work.

He didn't retaliate after they killed hundreds of Americans.

He turned down three offers from sudan to deliver bin laden to us.

He joined our enemies and destroyed our serbian allies in a war that was sponsored and financed by bin laden.

He separated our intelligence agencies to help defend himself in some of his major scandals.

Are you F#&$ing crazy!!!

Why would you elect them again??

2007-10-05 13:30:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think Middle Eastern countries would hate the U.S even more if Hillary Clinton became president? They would NOT respect her! Which means they would NOT corporate with the U.S.A as much! Our relationship with middle eastern countries is thin now, BUT trust me it could get easily worse! Not only that, but does she have ANY real experience dealing with middle east issues?

Yes or No, what is your opinion?

2007-10-05 13:28:06 · 17 answers · asked by Boomer 3

FOR PRESIDENT, whose with me on this one?

2007-10-05 12:35:59 · 32 answers · asked by Winter Glory 7

Mutual Interests, Religion or what?

2007-10-05 12:13:06 · 9 answers · asked by Accountant 2

Just no rational abilities?

2007-10-05 11:57:08 · 10 answers · asked by Cliff B 1

PLEASE WOULD YOU GIVE REASONS FOR OR AGAINST?


She would get my vote.

2007-10-05 11:48:03 · 18 answers · asked by Birdman 7

2007-10-05 11:47:17 · 14 answers · asked by Be-hive Baaaby 3

so i just wanted to take a survey and see who would vote for Hillary Clinton to be president of the United States in the 2008 elections if she was voted to run for it?

2007-10-05 11:18:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-05 11:04:41 · 5 answers · asked by Accountant 2

2007-10-05 09:35:30 · 8 answers · asked by LaToya H 1

2007-10-05 09:21:05 · 12 answers · asked by jimmymae2000 7

I say this because I know many people who do not vote in Presidential elections because they feel their vote doesn't matter. This is often based on the fact that their particular states usually swing in the opposite of their personal political ideologies from an electoral vote standpoint. Or because they live in a state with few electoral votes which are easily outweighed by the electoral votes of the large states.

2007-10-05 07:43:45 · 21 answers · asked by Bryan 7

2007-10-05 07:30:32 · 14 answers · asked by labken1817 6

Do you actually think your average person who votes is well informed and understands where all the parties stand on the issues of common debate, allowing them to make an educated decision ?

2007-10-05 07:29:10 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-05 07:27:54 · 15 answers · asked by Bryan 7

like a busted balloon after the primaries?

2007-10-05 07:23:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I saw another question - the asker was saying he didn't vote because he didn't ever like any of the candidates.
Should there be an optional selection on the ballots to say you didn't like any of the candidates.
Maybe you could still vote, but it would be an indication that none of the candidates is your top choice.
Would this encourage more people to actually vote?
Would it send a message to our leaders and to our peers that we're not happy?

2007-10-05 07:07:24 · 15 answers · asked by Roland'sMommy 6

2007-10-05 07:02:05 · 23 answers · asked by Bryan 7

It's funny that the NEW conservative party keeps on banging on about immigration, and guess what happens-yep! The polls show a bounce. I notice that there has been more hate violence in the last week, maybe someone can explain to me, civilly, why that should be so?

2007-10-05 07:00:17 · 18 answers · asked by mark b 1

about womens right to surforage or voting?

2007-10-05 06:34:37 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

...that they don't want to see the poor not receiving any Healthcare help before their wealthier middle class citizens do...as the reason...why Bush vetoed the recent change Congress tried to make for healthcare to help the people of this country?...And that a republican representative said with a smile...that they jus don't want the poor neglected...and that if THEY wanted too...healthcare could be passed today...CAN you IMAGINE who these people are with a statement like that?Isn't it sad that they would deny anyone and then divide them into groups as they make U.S. an excuse not to focus on this countries needs?
ESPECIALLY SAD when they enjoy all the best healthcare for their families?

2007-10-05 06:08:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

It’s a 2fer Do you think the Dems know that Rush is not running for president and don’t you just love Rush just drilling the Dems this week.

2007-10-05 06:03:52 · 13 answers · asked by barbara_farley77450 2

Should Laura Bush be Secretary of the Department of Education in 08?

I think she would do a great job!

2007-10-05 05:04:04 · 13 answers · asked by Kate 4

I am just curious to know. It seems to me that Ron Paul's foreign policy would resonate with many democrats.

2007-10-05 05:02:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-05 04:55:30 · 2 answers · asked by 8 1

Yahoo News has a story up right now about Bill Clinton in Britian on a fundraising tour. Why is he raising funds for a U.S. election in Britian?

2007-10-05 04:02:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Democrats that I have talked to say that they want to vote for Hillary because it will be like having Bill in the office again. Does anyone else feel this way? My biggest problem concerns her platform. What does she even stand for? She flipflops all over the place, and seems to be promising the same things that Bush did except for government run universal healthcare. She wants to give $5000 to every kid born in America. Talk about bankrupting the country. Won't every person in the world rush to America on their due date in hopes of winning the lottery per se. I really do think that Obama is a better choice, atleast he upholds democratic ideals and he is not so polarizing. Do you think she is going to win the nomination, and if she does, will that ruin the DNC's chances of holding office?

2007-10-05 03:57:16 · 10 answers · asked by Hoptoad City 4

I am willing to bet that the GOP held a meeting and told Bush to veto that bill and have their people permission to vote yes......

This way the republicans can publically distance themselves from a president with horrible ratings for the next election.

Bush can't run again, thankfully his career is over....the rest of the republicans can show how bipartisan and caring they are...and no one even talked about the money numbers that popped up over the weekend regarding Iraq...perfect timing (way to use a news cycle!!!!) We were all too focused on the veto.

and we Democrats helped!

Look at the numbers....$ Veto 35 Billion for American children and spend $190 Billion on Iraq and ask for $189 Billion for 2008 (associated press has the numbers)

They baited and switched (like how now we are in Iraq for freedom and terrorism when we really went for weapons that were never there)....and we all went for it!

2007-10-05 03:47:26 · 13 answers · asked by jm1970 6

I would think this day an age we should be going off the popular vote.

But if we still use the electoral vote because it is in the constitution... Well then I think we need to make the number of electoral votes the same for all states. Why does California, Texas, Floria, & New York have more pull than Wisconsin, Minnesota, Dakota's, etc?

2007-10-05 02:45:33 · 4 answers · asked by sargenthp 2

Do you think we should re-elect bush? why or why not?

2007-10-05 02:22:27 · 14 answers · asked by Slim 2