Elections - October 2007

Does she have a high IQ in education? What is her years of experience in politics? What is her religion and does she have strong family values, has she ever had an abortion?

2007-10-04 11:31:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-04 11:26:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Being a woman does not make you the answer for the United States. I want to know why you think anyone should vote for her.

2007-10-04 11:18:22 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

On election day will you:

1. Vote Hillary
2. Vote Republican
3. Stay home

2007-10-04 09:44:37 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've just read that Bush's approval rating has declined to 30%. I've heard before that approval ratings do indeed matter but I forgot the reasoning behind this. President Bush will be leaving office next year, so why would it really matter about his approval rating. Does anyone know why his approval rating still matters at this point? My guess is that it would hurt republican chances in the coming elections next year. But is this the only reasoning?

2007-10-04 09:42:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-04 09:28:30 · 3 answers · asked by tenpin299spare 1

.......The one who raises the most campaign money?

2007-10-04 08:44:10 · 9 answers · asked by KingHenry ll 2

Me and my colleagues are having a professional debate and I am looking for a recent link, September 2007 or October 2007 that shows Giuliani, or any Republican ahead of Hillary Clinton in a potential presidential match, I have searched and searched, can anyone help?

2007-10-04 08:39:06 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

The 2 Party system in America is really proving its weakness to its people. When i do participate in this forum I find myself quietly laughing at the how stupid it sounds to my ears when American people choose sides.. Democrat or Republican, The bottom line is, that there is absolutely no way, that 300 million people can be living in a democracy can be represented fairly with only two parties. Yes Europeans have many different fractures and issues with a multi-party system, but there is no inherent good that can come from a system claiming to represent 300 million people, especially when the man at the top listens to no one.. and these red necks who were elected by fraud and theft, on both sides are too stupid to understand that the world is not listening to them or Americans anymore. . Its time for a mult-party system in America`?

2007-10-04 08:37:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

This clown puts an emergency center in the WTC AFTER the 1993 bombing, communications systems WERE NOT upgraded, even though Islamic terrrorists had made it known New York City was a target and needlessly cuased respiratory illnesses with a rushed clean up of the WTC site.

Guiliani is nothing but a dirtbag giving photo ops AFTER 9/11, shamelessly exploiting 3000 deaths for his benefit and to cover up his incompetence of allowing and causing death, illness and injury.

but here's hoping Guiliani is the Republican nominee, the record he runs on is the record which deserves to be attacked.

2007-10-04 08:35:06 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-04 07:52:48 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Most of my family is Republican. Nearly all of them pretty much are disgusted by GW Bush, but yet they still are only even considering other republican candidates for president. Why is this?

2007-10-04 07:13:57 · 31 answers · asked by Luna Maya 4

We could change 'president' to 'CEO'. Outsource the job to Halliburton or Northrup Grumman. The CEO would have more political capital to get things done their way. We wouldn't need voters per se, the companies share holders could decide who leads the country, U.S. citizens, as 'customers' wouldn't need a say in the business end of country affairs, it would be a less stress non-voting relationship. In the dollar I trust...........

2007-10-04 07:09:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Rush Limbaugh claims 2 times. Is he right?

2007-10-04 06:52:30 · 6 answers · asked by kimmyisahotbabe 5

The Dems and Reps are looking more and more the same all the time.

2007-10-04 06:34:28 · 23 answers · asked by Ktcyan 5

After skipping the Univision and NAACP debates, I doubt he will get the minority vote. He definitely will not get the NRA vote. Evangelicals are threatening to run a third party candidate if he is the Republican nominee because he's pro-choice. He also wouldn't get the vote of Americans who no longer support the war in Iraq. If the GOP were smart, they would throw their support behind a proven conservative who differs with Bush on the war in Iraq and a candidate who actually showed up to the minority debates; but Guiliani is in the lead in the polls.

2007-10-04 05:42:22 · 23 answers · asked by speaking_my_mind 3

a) vote for the top candidate within your party to help ensure they won?
b) vote for your favorite candidate, even though that might ensure victory of the other party?
c) not vote at all

and why?

2007-10-04 05:13:03 · 14 answers · asked by Roland'sMommy 6

Why? And what issues are you most concern about?

2007-10-04 04:52:53 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Moveon.org, and other on the extreme left, have apparently captured the democratic party. At least according to many of those on the right.
The religious right, and people like Hannity and Limbaugh control the republicans. At least according to many of those on the left.
Are the two statements above true or false?
If not why are they not true?
Also, is the "gap" between these two extremes large enough that a third party, or 3rd party candidate, could get elected?

Thank You.

2007-10-04 04:07:42 · 5 answers · asked by Supercell 5

2007-10-04 04:02:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is THAT what makes him dangerous to the elite, old money who owns our banks in the USA?

2007-10-04 03:44:11 · 10 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

And what are the drawbacks? How does this affect dem. and rep. candidates?

2007-10-04 02:55:57 · 4 answers · asked by Shadow of a girl 3

Or is she telling us she's really not a woman but a transvestite?

2007-10-04 01:03:12 · 13 answers · asked by Melius 7

Can anyone tell me where any of the republican candidates would be different from W, other than being more conservative on immigration? Ron Paul would be different, all the candidates say they would be more agressive on immigration. What else? They have all criticized the handling of the war, but not said they would do anything different. They all believe in his tax cuts, his judges, his policy of expanding democracy inthe mideast. Other than immigration are any of them proposing doing anything differently than the least popular president since Nixon?

2007-10-04 00:50:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/10/03/us/politics/20071004THOMPSON_index.html?th&emc=th
.

2007-10-04 00:16:23 · 10 answers · asked by mstrywmn 7

I think Hilary will be the next president eventhough Obama is trying hard.

2007-10-04 00:06:54 · 11 answers · asked by alfredp333 2

2007-10-03 23:34:07 · 17 answers · asked by aswkingfish 5

George Soros Is nothing but a American TRAITOR He hates America and he's brain washing all the simple minded Liberals .He claims to be for free speech but he is spending tons on trying to eliminate talk shows because they show what a piece of trash he really is . He spends his money on silencing anyone who doesn't agree with his sick views he uses Hitler like propaganda to promote one of his puppets to be President . I'm going to devote a web site showing what a turd of a man he really is!

2007-10-03 23:10:50 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-03 22:25:34 · 19 answers · asked by - 5

Many folks I have talked too, personally, have suggested a feeling of disgust, as in politicking "as usual". Do American's really see these "poiticians", as more than they are...like their gods??? These "politicians" seem to hold incredable sway over their constituents. For the record, I support representative Ron Paul for our next commander in cheif...strictly due to his perfect record in voting for his constituencies demands accordinmg to our constitution. I do NOT see representative Paul as a Christ replacement. What I'm asking is...do MOST American's view their representatives such as Ted Kennedy & Ted Stevens as messianic gods that can cure all mankind's pitfalls? Is all the furor over these candidates for our next president motivated by a motive of worship/hope for the constituents eternity, or just for personal gain/status????

2007-10-03 21:32:01 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous