Elections - October 2007

2007-10-14 13:48:05 · 20 answers · asked by lopingdeer 2

If Al Gore decides to run for President, what do YOU think will happen to Hillary????

2007-10-14 13:11:01 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Someone asked M.Romney when he and his wife first slept together. If that is a fair question they why can't they ask Hillary if she knows how many affairs Bill has had?

2007-10-14 12:47:47 · 9 answers · asked by netjr 6

2007-10-14 12:41:43 · 34 answers · asked by GODDESS 1

What would you think if our nation had a Democrat President, and the Congress was largely Democratic? I want you to think HARD about this.........and not give a snap judgment. TRY real HARD to think about what GOOD things they have done in the past 25 years or so.....and project that forward to our near future. Give those poor folks a chance here........let's come up with some good answers to bolster ourselves up a bit ! Okay? First one to jump in on the answers deserves a frog in their pool. Let's go. . . . . . . .

2007-10-14 12:19:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

You don't like HIllary, right ??? Well, just erase those thoughts for a moment, and picture her in your mind taking the oath of office of President, in a stunning designer outfit, dancing at the Inaugaural Ball in a designer gown, radiant and happy. Imagine her behind the desk in the Oval Office, well groomed and lovely. Imagine her making landmark decisons as our President, decisions that would better our nation, that would make us safer. Let's give her the benefit of the doubt here, folks, and try to picture Hillary as a GOOD President. Can we do this? We do need to be objective here, let all prejudices go, and look at what positive she has done, and would continue to do. Your honest thoughts please, as you TRY to do this !!

2007-10-14 12:05:05 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are you voting for her???? Not to be too personal.. but I want to know! I for one am not.. the Clintons are sleezzzes as my dad says.

2007-10-14 09:29:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-14 09:21:19 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-14 09:09:34 · 7 answers · asked by Jeff R 1

I think we can agree the neocons will vote for paul as a last resort against clinton. Yet in the primaries there votes will be split amoung 5 to 6 differnt canidates.

This leaves ron paul to rake up his own support which is growing daily.

you cant deny this and only say, paul has a 1% chance of winning. I think the rest of the canidates are screwed.


Freedom is popular. Ron Paul in 2008

2007-10-14 08:42:40 · 17 answers · asked by Boston George 3

2007-10-14 07:51:50 · 4 answers · asked by Kyle 4 Ty (Sparkles can watch) 2

2007-10-14 07:45:46 · 9 answers · asked by jennifer j 1

Giuliani is still leading nationally closely followed by thompson, Romney is leading in key states, and Thompson is doing good both in the states and nationally but he kinda did poorly in the CNBC debate. The thing with Giuliani and Romney is that Giuliani is pro-choice and that James Dobson character might run a third party candidate (vote spoiler like Ross Perot) and if Romney gets the nomination there are a bunch of bigots who won't vote for him just because he is a mormon. I personally think Giuliani has some bi-partisal appeal and Romney is a grest speaker. While thompson has the best conservative record. Its a tough call. What do you think? There is a poll of likely caucus participants and romney won it. Can that forshadow anything about his chances of getting the nominations (even though hes not doing well nationally)

2007-10-14 07:26:08 · 13 answers · asked by tehmazing 3

I think there was a lot of apathy during the Kerry/Bush election...

I heard a lot of people my age and younger saying things like "oh boy... I get to choose between frick and frack..."

Many of them could not put their Xbox paddles down long enough to register - let alone vote.

Will this new "variety" among candidates encourage younger voters or not?

2007-10-14 06:59:46 · 15 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6

And, if he does - will he and the nutcases who vote for him ruin it for Hillary Clinton? Usually a vote for another party is "vote" to a Republican.

Will this happen?

2007-10-14 06:59:21 · 11 answers · asked by Kyle 4 Ty (Sparkles can watch) 2

Votes for John Edwards to be Vice President in 2008
elections, will work to help the next president of the
United States clean up, to restore Peace among the U.S
and foreign nations, his views on the war in Iraq and most
candidates are alike in terms of withdrawal, and funding
which is draining! not only in money! but in energy also.
when you Fund, you pay for something, that will be a
benefit to others, so far nothing is happening in terms of
democracy, or election of government for Iraq. The fight
is about tribal rein, and islamic laws! whose emphasis is
on terrorism to defend their ilslamic cause. It is unrealistic
to run a country solely on a prophet's ideology. An illusion
will not form a government. A Prime Minister will, and of
any tribe. After all it's all Islam! if the Military got out of Iraq
somebody has to rule, and the fight continues.

2007-10-14 06:17:24 · 11 answers · asked by Joan Sandverysmart 4

Hillary would be so awful as President that the USA would never again elect another democrat! The economy would fall to pieces under Hillary, taxes would go to the moon, and 911's would be a weekly occurrence! Republican's would benefit and become America's #1 Party!

2007-10-14 06:02:27 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

if you check http://www.usastrawpolls.com/ you can see that Ron Paul has won most straw polls and post televised debate polls, often by landslide numbers, but the mainstream national polls (gallup, usa today, the big 3 networks) still show him as 2-3%. I wish someone could explain how this is possible?

2007-10-14 05:37:23 · 8 answers · asked by Jeremy S 1

Folks seem to align themselves with polical parties, kind of like sports teams. If you are a yankees fan, you are a yankees fan (with few exceptions), no matter who is on the team, no matter who coaches, usually no matter what. Kind of like many Republicans are behind Bush even though he (and those that support him) spend money like it does not matter and has started a war resulting in 100,000's of deaths (this is not pro-life), on admitedly false information. Democrats are currently aligning themselves behind a Clinton because she has the best chance of winning for their team.

Let's outlaw parties and people grouping together in politics before they are elected. This way folks will be forced to look at the actual issues rather than, who has the best chance of winning. I fear 100 years from now folks are still going to be thinking Dem/Rep as the two options when they are basically the same. We need new viewpoints and we need to focus on more than War, Sex Scandals and Health Care.

2007-10-14 03:28:16 · 6 answers · asked by yakrafter 2

2007-10-14 02:05:48 · 9 answers · asked by maggot_boy2004 2

2007-10-14 01:50:28 · 10 answers · asked by The G Man 1

Gen. Sanchez oversaw US troops in Iraq before he retired, now he says it's a national nightmare with no end in sight and the Administration, the State Department, Congress, and the Defense Department are to blame. Isn't it a shame people like him have to retire before they can say what is really going on over there? I'll bet there are some chickenhawks here who still think they know better than him.

But will people begin to wake up?

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHVHFK8tFBx8

2007-10-14 00:55:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Personally i think its because their gutless, selfish cowards, generation Y that is.

2007-10-14 00:46:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

by that i mean do you think a woman could get voted in. do you think a black man could get voted in? i think a woman could, but i'm not sure if a black man could. there is still to much racisim.

2007-10-13 23:46:18 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

With such a short time to get enrolled , who benifits from such a short time

2007-10-13 19:20:04 · 5 answers · asked by the.texican 3

She is ahead by 20-30 in all of the polls, and we all know that in order to win an election the candidate must be able to get some votes from across party lines.... Are the Dems so self distructive that they do not understand this?

2007-10-13 18:58:26 · 12 answers · asked by Dina W 6

Im not into politics anymore, I use to say .. they're all idiots.. But after watching Rudds speach today, I think he's the man that should be in the seat...

He made some great points about the current government, that they are old and stale and no new ideas for our country...

I tell you, if Rudd does mean what he says he's got my vote!

Did you see it? what do you think? is our current government stale?

2007-10-13 18:47:26 · 10 answers · asked by Inquiring Mind 3

It just seems like if the Republicans wanted to win and restore their party and image they should be looking at the one guy who matches the Democratic party and might actually pick up quite a few Democratic votes as well.

The Republicans are losing hundreds and thousands of votes because of Iraq. Ron Paul says he will end the war and bring home the troops immediatly. So wouldn't it be smart for the Republicans to save their votes and party by selecting Ron Paul?

2007-10-13 16:20:43 · 15 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4

What policy matters will drive your voting behavior?

2007-10-13 14:20:47 · 13 answers · asked by My Big Bear Ron 6

Who do you think would run our country better? No funny comments thanks.

2007-10-13 14:18:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous