2007-10-14 09:21:19 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Mitt Romney
2007-10-14 09:42:09 · answer #1 · answered by Mikey 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
There's only 1 Republican candidate that I would vote for and that's Ron Paul, but I don't think the GOP is going to allow an idealist to be nominated. That's why we need campaign finance reform like Al Gore wanted when he was running for President. That would take away the money machine candidates and allow other candidates to be just as competitive.
2007-10-15 03:47:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
everybody who states a promise like that (even if or not they are Republican or Democrat) is conscious little about the state of the monetary gadget.... or that they imagine that it really is what the american voters opt for to take heed to. both way, i'd not be inspired with a boast or promise like that. Balancing the budget is the least of our concerns. a nationwide monetary gadget shoud by no skill be dealt with as a relatives monetary employer account. that is a lot more suitable complicated than in basic terms asserting that you may stability a nationwide budget. i might want to wish a lot more suitable than a promise to stability the budget... i pick to comprehend how everybody plans to do it and why.
2016-10-21 03:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter...no way a Republican is going to win the next election.
2007-10-14 10:59:34 · answer #4 · answered by sketch_mylife 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul.
2007-10-15 02:38:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would be hard-pressed to vote for any of them. Not a single one has anything that I think is right for the American people at this time. However, I am keeping an open mind.
2007-10-14 09:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by CarlisleGirl 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton is an enthusiastic supporter of the war. She must be a war profiteer. I would vote of Ron Paul.
2007-10-14 10:08:09 · answer #7 · answered by julio_slsc 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I will vote for Ron Paul. Even though I don't agree with all his ideas. He has so many good ideas that with the support of the people, he will start to turn America towards a brighter future.... safer, less debt, less government,less corruption, more respect, .........a better America for you and your children.
2007-10-14 09:43:03 · answer #8 · answered by Jack 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Rudy.
He was a great US District Attorney and a great Mayor of New York. When he became mayor the city was a mess. He cleaned it up, reduced crime, got rid of all of the sleaze in Times Square and made it a wonderful tourist destination. He straightened out the finances. As a former New Yorker he has my enthusiastic support.
As a former New Yorker I would be appalled to have Hillary as President. The carpetbagger should go back to Arkansas.
I think Rudy is the only one who can beat her.Fred would be a great choice for VP. He would help Rudy in the south and west.
2007-10-14 09:35:40 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Wisdom 4 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Ron Paul as far as im concerned he is the only person running.
2007-10-14 11:17:53 · answer #10 · answered by SS4 Elby 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋