Im not into politics anymore, I use to say .. they're all idiots.. But after watching Rudds speach today, I think he's the man that should be in the seat...
He made some great points about the current government, that they are old and stale and no new ideas for our country...
I tell you, if Rudd does mean what he says he's got my vote!
Did you see it? what do you think? is our current government stale?
2007-10-13 18:47:26 · 10 answers · asked by Inquiring Mind 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
lol The Dude, thats funny..
Sorry.. I meant The Australian Election on the 24th November!
2007-10-13 18:57:38 · update #1
Howard is as stale as my bottle of VB I missplaced last Xmas Party. No Ideas, No Policies, No Nothing. His tired old team badly need a new transfusion of Vitamins and Speed.
Not that is going to Help. Rudd has new ideas and is HONEST. Something I can't say about John. Watch Howards policy speeches, He will Hit the Man and not the Ball. Tired old Govt. Go Kevin. Tmess2, You are correct.
2007-10-13 21:28:35 · answer #1 · answered by Dick E knee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi i'm going to vote labour through fact they basically agree that investment in public provider is mandatory for society. i'm from a unfavorable area if south London and over the final ten years I certainly have seen genuine substitute that's all attributable to labour incestmnt. The terrible council sources replaced into replaced via first rate residences. i think that if people stay in sturdy situations they experience greater self-worth and could behave greater advantageous. The tax credit scheme has allowed many unfavorable single mums to get decrease back to artwork, whether their earning have been low. we've had checklist investment in preparation, well being, police and the militia. Society has definately greater decrease than labour.. it is undemanding. we've much less poverty, decrease crime and greater advantageous standards of residing. I hardship that the Tories will opposite all this super artwork... It seeks like they won't cut back spending too a lot so perhaps i'm incorrect. yet a conservative via definition needs a tiny state and that i think a small state is yet in any different case of asserting 'your on your guy or woman regardless if your challenge'
2016-11-08 06:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Damn! I missed it! I saw Howards speach, and I was waiting and waiting for Rudd's and it just seemed to take ages and I got distracted. Oh well, guess I'll wait for 6:00. I hope Rudd gets in over Howard.
Also, people seem to have stopped talking about Costello taking over 6 months down the track if the Libs get in again...
2007-10-13 19:21:35 · answer #3 · answered by violet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudd will win. Howard's on the way out. Rudd leads in the polls and most people seem to prefer a Labour government.
2007-10-13 18:53:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The ALP will get the majority in the House of Representatives. I think the Lib/Nats will keep the majority in the Senate. I see a double dissolution in 2009.
2007-10-13 19:55:23 · answer #5 · answered by Tmess2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In most liklihood it will be Hilliary and Guiliani and that election is up for grabs. Hilliary is polarizing but has a large fan base due to Bill, while Giuliani can appeal to moderates and those in the middle of the isle. It's a tossup.
2007-10-13 18:55:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm hoping for Ron Paul voting for him also
oops wrong country lol
2007-10-13 18:54:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rudy Giuliani .
2007-10-13 19:53:28 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Jeremy for Pres. in '08!!!!!
2007-10-13 19:08:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know about England, but all the candidates in the US are losers, so the loser will win.
2007-10-13 18:56:15 · answer #10 · answered by paul 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋