Elections - November 2006

How hilarious. Does the name William "Freezer" Jefferson strike a bell, Ms. Pelosi?

Not to mention a fact that our one party media will never mention: that numerous Democrats took much more money from Abramoff than the worst Republicans did. Including even the Democrat's Senate Minority Leader, "Honest" Harry Reid.

But of course no Democrat ever resigns, no matter how perfidious their behavior. "Honest" Harry Reid refuses to even give the Abramoff money back.

That is just one of the many benefits the DNC enjoy from controlling the media and indeed the rest of the establishment.

They face no accountability. Ever.

2006-11-04 02:47:35 · 12 answers · asked by bushfan88 5

Here you have it from their own lips:

Greater Defeat Than Vietnam"

A report in the online publication World Net Daily says some leaders of terrorist organizations are openly encouraging Americans to vote for Democrats… in order to hasten a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq.

Jihad Jaara — a senior member of the Palestinian Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade — says "of course Americans should vote Democrat." He went on to say a withdrawal from Iraq would mark the beginning of the collapse of what he called the U.S. "tyrant empire" — and would deal the US "a greater defeat than Vietnam."

Abu Ayman — a leader of Islamic jihad in Jenin — tells World Net Daily he is "emboldened" by Americans who compare Iraq to Vietnam. And the senior leader of that Palestinian group — says Democratic predictions that a withdrawal would end the insurgency are incorrect — and that a pullout would "prove the resistance is the most important tool — and that this tool works."

2006-11-04 02:23:32 · 18 answers · asked by ? 5

please its important!!!

2006-11-04 02:21:52 · 7 answers · asked by m 3

McCaskill has always supported the horrible procedure of partial birth abortion, but has flip-flopped only days before the election and now says she's against it.

She has always been against gun owners' constitutional rights, is rated "F" by the NRA, and tells the inner city voters that she wants more gun control than the 30,000 firearms laws in the nation today. But she also tries to tell hunters and others in largely rural Missouri that she supports their rights to firearms.

2006-11-04 02:13:52 · 6 answers · asked by senior citizen 5

2006-11-04 02:05:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-04 02:05:07 · 3 answers · asked by MackDaddy10 1

2006-11-04 02:00:57 · 8 answers · asked by Lisa M 3

I think the Democrats will once again cry "voter suppression". What do you think?

2006-11-04 01:45:31 · 11 answers · asked by MackDaddy10 1

And where can he expect his votes to come from? if all good Americans support our troops 100%.

2006-11-04 01:41:55 · 19 answers · asked by Harry J 2

i just read that mel gibson will be running for governor of ny his home state. what do you think of this? i think this is crazy and hollywood politicians are going too far!!!

2006-11-04 01:26:48 · 4 answers · asked by Buzz All Children 1

I'm a Christian but not an evangelical. I believe what I am taught by the Holy Spirit and know that no one is perfect and what anyone else does or does not do will not influence my beliefs. To base a vote on a fallen person would be to deny my own beliefs and convictions and worse yet, I would be looking to a person or institution rather than God.

What do you think?

2006-11-04 01:17:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQhQaQyn-ek

2006-11-04 01:13:42 · 9 answers · asked by Reba K 6

I live in Virginia and we use touchscreen Diebold voting machines. I saw an HBO documentary on how easy it is to hack those machines to get a false result that is not easily detected....its all in the memory card which is rigged off-sight and you can hack the results without even needing the password. This to me is not about political parties....this is an outrage to what we supposedly are - a democracy. Are we a democracy anymore? Do you think we should go back to paper ballots? I'm voting on Tuesday but I'm not sure at all that it will matter.

2006-11-04 01:09:05 · 6 answers · asked by paperorplastic 2

2006-11-04 00:55:35 · 8 answers · asked by MEL T 7

it's time for a change?

2006-11-04 00:24:34 · 16 answers · asked by jeffy6733 1

Just curious!

2006-11-04 00:12:58 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testified under oath in front of the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio.

He tells the members how he was hired by Congressman Tom Feeney in 2000 to build a prototype software package that would secretly rig an election to sway the result 51 / 49 to a specified side.

2006-11-03 23:47:07 · 12 answers · asked by Nick 2

Everytime the parties are described it is always "the rich and powerful Reupblicans" and "The Democrats"? I am a Republican, middle class working woman, from the South.Without exception, my friends are all middle class working Americans who vote Republican. The Democrats that are "trying" to make life better for us all are people who are beyond wealthy! John Kerry, who is married to the widow of the Heinz billionaire, Barbara Streisand, Oprah, The Clintons. Ted Kennedy the list goes on. These people are all beyond wealthy. Sure they want to "make" the world better for the "little" guy, but they want to use the little guy's money to do it!!! Seems to be two types of Dems. The ones who have money but don't want to use their money they want to use ours, and the kind that want to take the money i.e. through govt. programs etc. Remember there are middle class in both parties.

2006-11-03 23:32:06 · 9 answers · asked by Only hell mama ever raised 6

How is it that I keep getting calls from politicians running for office when I am registered on the federal no call list? Doesn't it make them a criminal to call people on the federal no call list?

2006-11-03 23:25:18 · 9 answers · asked by Robster01 3

National elections 2000 and 2004 .

2006-11-03 23:14:48 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

this is my very first time voting and i'm glad to be part of it. But, I still don't understand everything, yet. I have a mix of republics and democrats on my list of people i want to vote for. I was told that I could only vote for one side. I don't agree with everything on just one side. Is there a way I can vote for the people I want to see make it? Remember this is my first time at voting so, all this is new to me. I have done my homework on the issues and where these people stand. How does voting work? Do we all get the same list and we can vote for who we want or do you tell "them" what side we are on and they give us that sides list?
I hope I haven't confused anyone. I just don't understand what to do, yet. Plus, I'm not for sure if I'm republican or democrat since, my list is an, almost, equal split of both sides.
What am I suppose to say when they ask me what side I am on?

2006-11-03 23:12:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Unfortunately, it's already easy to make a bomb:

http://www.beloit.edu/~belmag/03fall/03fall_features/03fall_dobson.html

The hard part is getting the uranium. Guess these students didn't have tickets to Niger!

The government shouldn't have posted the plans. But the information is out there.

The REAL story is that the Times is now on record as saying Saddam was a big danger. There is NO WAY on Earth to argue that these plans are a danger but that Saddam (who had them and was working to implement them) was NOT a danger.

What's your explanation?

2006-11-03 22:53:53 · 5 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

Supported the Iraq War but who never served in the military?

Used racial and ethnic slurs?

Opposed same-sex marriange but may be gay themselves?

2006-11-03 22:46:10 · 19 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7

If so, please explain in detail your reasoning.

2006-11-03 22:10:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

this would be a party that:

a) stands for civil liberties - free speech, free press, right to assemble, in essence everything in the bill of rights except the outdated absolute of the right to bear arms (guns ok with restrictions and licensing). we don't care if you're gay, straight or chartreuse - whatever you do in your bedroom is your business, as long as it doesn't affect us.

b) campaign finance reform - drastic. the publicly owned airwaves (and they are publicly owned) will be given over to x amount of time per campaign year per candidate for a live presentation. no paid commercials. no contribution, individual or corporate, over US$500. period. no loopholes! i mean none. fullstop.

c) fiscal responsibilty. no more corporate welfare. the rich pay their share. the middle class gets a break, the poor get a leg up when necessary.

d) responsible, pragmatic foreign policy. anything but the bush-cheney model.

e) generous funding of public (not private) education

2006-11-03 21:49:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

We know he is a defeated, pathetic soul that makes dumb comments but why put the gag on him? I understand alot of dems cancled him from their election rally's. He is the voice of their beliefs why hide it?

2006-11-03 20:18:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Have a level 5 committee of 12 count the votes?

2006-11-03 18:50:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isnt it kind of funny that one of Dumya's religious advisers is involved in a sex, drug, gay scandal. Especially since the GOP runs on an anti-gay, pro-morality platform??? With this latest scandal can the gop possibly hold the moral high ground anymore??http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_re_us/haggard_sex_allegations

2006-11-03 18:44:56 · 16 answers · asked by Frank R 7

this was quoted by Josef Stalin, the former dictator. If anyone can tell me why he would say this or if anyone can just explain this quote, then thanks

2006-11-03 18:05:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is for all the Texans out there. Who do you think will win the Governor's election?

2006-11-03 18:04:15 · 9 answers · asked by Katie 1