English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testified under oath in front of the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio.

He tells the members how he was hired by Congressman Tom Feeney in 2000 to build a prototype software package that would secretly rig an election to sway the result 51 / 49 to a specified side.

2006-11-03 23:47:07 · 12 answers · asked by Nick 2 in Politics & Government Elections

http://www.hack247.co.uk/2006/11/02/american-election-hacker-testifies/

2006-11-03 23:47:30 · update #1

12 answers

Democracy is dead my friends until we return to paper ballots and support a third party that will hold these hopeless bozos Dems and Republicans' feet to the fire. The whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.

2006-11-04 01:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by paperorplastic 2 · 0 0

Vote no matter if the game is rigged or not because its a voice anyways because it forces more accountbility and transpracy in the system. Go back to paper ballot would be he way to go because diebold machines code is copyright protected, and voting machine for die-bold, or Sequoira is not open sourced therefore probadly gonna be voter fraud possible with both poltical parties.

2006-11-04 07:54:01 · answer #2 · answered by ram456456 5 · 2 0

It gets curiouser and curiouser. We've lost some of our free speech, the news, except for a few sources that I know of, like Link TV, and sometimes, CNN, has mostly been canceled. If our vote is taken away, and the religious right tells us who we can and can't marry, whether we must have a child we don't want, and that we must live with our diseases instead of allowing for medical progress with stem cell research, then I don't know how we're so different from other dictatorships. Is it because we kill less of our own people in Iraq than Saddam killed of his own people in iraq?

2006-11-04 08:01:36 · answer #3 · answered by jean_kilczer 1 · 0 1

NO, ALL VOTING SHOULD BE MANUAL.NO COMPUTERS. TRADITIONAL WAYS. IT'S LONGER BUT MORE SECURE. BESIDES WHAT THE F**K DO YOU PAY CIVIL SERVANTS FOR ANYWAY?THEY SHOULD ORGANIZE THIS.KOALAT...WHAT IS IT WITH ALL OF YOU PEOLE WHO GO ON ABOUT "LIBERALS". LIBERAL MEANS LIBERTY ORIENTED PEOPLE. IF YOU WANT TO LIVE IN A STERILE SOCIETY WHERE YOU CAN'T DO S**T THEN GO TO CHINA OR RUSSIA. IF HALF OF THE PEOPLE WHO COMPLAIN ABOUT LIBERALS LIVED IN A REAL NON-LIBERAL COUNTRY THEN THEY'D SOON CHANGE THEIR TUNE.

2006-11-04 07:56:06 · answer #4 · answered by kwenzini 3 · 2 0

I don't think we should refrain from voting. We need to vote and make the choices on who should control our state (and our country.) So vote this Tuesday for who you want.

2006-11-04 07:49:21 · answer #5 · answered by Kristen H 6 · 1 0

It sure would make voting easier for me as long as my side wins.

2006-11-04 07:51:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Never trust a computer. If man invented it man can corrupt it.

2006-11-04 08:02:17 · answer #7 · answered by ChaliQ 4 · 1 0

Voting is our sacred franchise

2006-11-04 08:20:02 · answer #8 · answered by gdeach 3 · 0 0

of course not they choose the popular vote

2006-11-04 07:48:47 · answer #9 · answered by -tima 3 · 0 0

if your liberal ..yes...voting by that party can only do this country serious damage.

2006-11-04 07:52:00 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers