Current Events - March 2007

2007-03-17 16:27:48 · 8 answers · asked by stevemxusa 6

2007-03-17 16:23:04 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-17 16:22:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Was Osama Bin Laden correct?
When soldiers were killed and their bodies butchered in Somali- the answer was to cut and run- and from the onset of the Iraq invasion- there were individuals ready to quit at any set-back?

Let me make it clear- I am not passing on the validity of the Iraq situation- What I am asking is, because the majority of them neither are hurt by, nor have to sacrifice anything for the foreign policy of their nation- are these protestors mostly a bunch of wishy-washy, smug and insulated crybabies?

2007-03-17 16:08:33 · 14 answers · asked by pavano_carl 4

2007-03-17 15:48:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

he looks like a big fat chulo culo

2007-03-17 15:42:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not sure this has a right or wrong answer but I do think it an important exercise to do. After all America was either bought, stoled, or given to its current occupiers, just as the Israelis. Should America be give back to the Indians "their" lands and everyone else go back to where they descended from? This seems like an absurd question to Americans. Isn't the real question not who has the right but can't we get along no matter what the nation is called and who resides there? Maybe if we started seeing each other as world citizens and less of us vs. them we'd have a whole lot less strife in this world.

2007-03-17 15:37:28 · 9 answers · asked by Love of Truth 5

Example,,,
USA Truckers, $200 a day.
Mexican truckers, $25 a day.

In 5 yrs, $110 a day, for all.
Bush wants no southern border.

2007-03-17 15:32:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please state your opinion about the policies Pakistan should adapt in order to become a better country.

2007-03-17 15:24:20 · 13 answers · asked by Hello 2

Obama or Hillary or John Edwards?

2007-03-17 14:51:28 · 9 answers · asked by juan.hunglo 2

are they fighting for their beliefs or just a bunch of renegades who are just as bad as bush and blair?

2007-03-17 14:23:26 · 13 answers · asked by Ken M 3

2007-03-17 14:16:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

All these "insurgents" are is terrorists. Who can give me a clear concise answer? For those who dont get it, this war in Iraq is STILL the war on terrorism. Who else would use chlorine gas on innocent children, women, able- bodied men? God bless our troops, the true heroes of today, including Cindy Sheehan's son.

2007-03-17 14:14:44 · 8 answers · asked by juan.hunglo 2

After all someday the US super power is going to come down should we do the same to the US nationals what they are doing to iraq and others, you tell me.

2007-03-17 13:40:38 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

year / how / why

2007-03-17 13:30:21 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is the reason which made us doubt and invade Iraq?

Saddam was a terror.. and he is gone. Now what?

Almost 60% of this ancient land has been destroyed... but why this unending attraction is still prevailing to destory more?

2007-03-17 13:02:39 · 10 answers · asked by ManhattanGirl 5

Meaning jobs replaced with lower cost workers.
............................................
Also the trucking, replace them also. Why not ?

2007-03-17 12:54:40 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

started the war on USA soil? forgot about September 11?
This war simply proves that the hijackers are the same people they are fighting in Iraq today. USA has made an accurate target at where these 9/11 masterminds came from (middle-east/iraqi/iranian...etc.

2007-03-17 12:46:26 · 12 answers · asked by Nick s 1

Jihad this, Jihad that. blah blah blah.

TVNZ.com

A smaller group of war supporters held a counter-demonstration with signs that said: "Win the war or lose to jihad," "Our troops are shedding their blood to keep terrorists from America,"

I was a troop for almost ten years, and this is what troops are shedding blood for.

The following is an exchange between Rep. John F. Tierney (D-MA) and Halliburton/KBR's director of government compliance, William Walter, shows that the Bush administration began planning for troop safety long after it made plans to secure the safety of Iraq's oil fields.


Mr. TIERNEY. OK. Now, when GAO issued yesterday's report on LOGCAP [Halliburton's troop support contract], one of their key findings was that the planning for the use of LOGCAP's contract to support the troops in Iraq did not begin until after the fall of Baghdad. You looked at that report and didn't make any objections or corrections, so we are assuming that is an agreeable

2007-03-17 12:40:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Insurgents lay their weopons down then US and allies would view it as a truce, but they (the insurgents) keep aggravating the condition.

2007-03-17 12:19:22 · 4 answers · asked by Nick s 1

I'll answer my own question.
9/11- 7 Minutes
Hurricane Katrina- 5 Days
Iraq- 4 years and counting
Bin Laden- 5 years and counting
Aren't these enough reasons to find a replacement and impeach him.

2007-03-17 12:19:19 · 10 answers · asked by Reganomics 3

a private jet

2007-03-17 11:49:07 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-17 11:41:35 · 3 answers · asked by angel_of_darkness2480 2

They stole kids away from their homeland! The think "the West" is automatically superior, so therefore BIGOTS!! Let those kids go home!

2007-03-17 11:37:36 · 15 answers · asked by Joe C. 2

i was told today that some ancient philosopher said...that world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones...and i dint really think about it..but know i am..and its kinda scary cosits making me wonder.....how bad could ww3 be to send civillisation into that state!?!?

2007-03-17 11:25:49 · 10 answers · asked by sunshine_girl 3

Only in the new world.

2007-03-17 11:25:42 · 7 answers · asked by 8ball 1

i wonder what is IQ is

2007-03-17 11:23:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

approximately 50 dead per day in CNN statistics now in Iraq.
All what they passed away in Saddam's Era were about 1000 person killed during 35 years

2007-03-17 11:22:27 · 8 answers · asked by saedtah 1

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

Look all of these extremely educated and high-ranking, intelligence officers, retired military officers, and university professors. What a list of informed people they are.

2007-03-17 10:55:35 · 13 answers · asked by one_dog_grinning 2

Iran should be able to have nuclear weapons. It is clearly legal for them to have it. The US said that Iran has plently of oil. So, what if oil runs out? Nuclear does not only have to be for weapons. Also it has been clearly stated far too many times that it is not allowed in Islam to use nuclear weapons under peaceful circumstances. The US also said that it may make the rest of the middle-east under pressure to have nuclear weapons too but doesn't Israel have nuclear weapons?

2007-03-17 10:55:28 · 21 answers · asked by Mystx 1