English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Current Events - February 2007

[Selected]: All categories News & Events Current Events

Since youtube have started cleaning the channels of anything that seems remoptely non-lame, I need a good host that can carry video and commentary of a political flavour a site that supports and encourages difference of opinion and freedom of speech. Youtube WAS great but now I dont know what they are thinking

2007-02-11 02:28:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

what do you make of President Putins comments when he says you want to dominate the world..is he right.

2007-02-11 02:05:01 · 19 answers · asked by ? 5

I am dreading the day the economy ruening,job stealing liberals weaken our country again.They already been proven failiors. The war is not Bushes fault. So please dont vote for another lieing adaultiorous,tax raising politition. Because I need to feed my family. Now watch the liberals start accusing me with lies because I shine the lite. please excuse my spelling errors.I am running out of time.

2007-02-11 01:41:33 · 11 answers · asked by Triplndy 2

If it is not successful, his presidency will go from being a lame duck to a dead duck. What will the consequences be?

2007-02-11 01:25:33 · 8 answers · asked by Sky Salad Clipper 3

If all the guys looked like Wentworth Miller and the Winchester boys of Supernatural, do you think birth rates would increase and the problem of ageing societies would be solved?

2007-02-11 01:06:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Don't they realize those soldiers have friends and family that will want to seek revenge? How do they figure killing will stop the killing?
Call for a Cease Fire.

Great Legislator

2007-02-11 00:27:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does this have remifications for Hogans, entertainment carreer and Clintons bid for the White House?

2007-02-11 00:18:23 · 11 answers · asked by The Orange Deity 2

2007-02-11 00:06:57 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Anna Nicole Smith was the illegitimate daughter of Monroe and Hefner. She was raised by distant relatives of Monroe in Texas. Her father Hefner was a known CIA operative, active from through-out the Cold War with ties to the Bush family, who are tied to the Saudi royal family. Anna Nicole, bin Ladin and George W. were childhood friends in Texas. They met frequently in the Bahamas to develop strategies for international oil policies. Prince Frederic von Anhalt and Howard Marshall were particippants in this Hollywood, Texas Oil, international terroism conspiracy. Marshall, Hefner, Bush Sr. and von Anhalt all being WW2 buddies.

2007-02-10 23:44:19 · 19 answers · asked by The Orange Deity 2

2007-02-10 23:30:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-10 23:25:53 · 10 answers · asked by Natz 1

Poor Hilary Clinton. She voted to invade Iraq in 02 and now says " If I knew then what I know now I never would have voted in favor of the use of US military force in Iraq."
But she did. And so did most of the Senate: Democrat and Republican. It was her JOB to investigate, evaluate, and initiate action regarding Iraq and she chose to vote the way she did. Do you think Hilary should take responsiblity for her vote then, and stop making Bush the bad guy because she voted the way she did???How is her voting for Iraq invasion, Bush's fault??Can anyone help me out here?Two-Faced Backstabber? Or just Fickle-Flake??

2007-02-10 22:55:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-10 22:36:39 · 3 answers · asked by geerthena r 1

2007-02-10 22:35:09 · 5 answers · asked by flashingsigns♥ 1

I just watched this documentary. "Terrorists" are not going to destroy this country, "nuclear weapons" are not going to destroy this country, immigration, legal or non legal is not going to destroy this country. The BORN AGAIN EVANGELICALS ARE going to destroy this country. They are dangerous and the top threat to this country. Bush is part of them. They believe that he has been annointed by "god." The american government wants creation taught in schools. Kansas is one state that fell for it. 75% of home-schooled are Evangelicals. That is, 80 million kids that are forced into believing that they need to take over the U.S. They have no belief in global warming. They think that "god" is coming soon, so go ahead and tear down trees and forests, pollute.Wreck the earth.They say Harry Potter is an enemy of "god", and should be put to death. This is a scary thoufgt, what these kids are being forced to do, and what they are going to be. This is a classic case of child abuse.

2007-02-10 22:34:09 · 5 answers · asked by St♥rmy Skye 6

I a big fan of the US ideals about freedom and democracy but isnt the war in Iraq going too far?

Ive done some research and i was in awe to know some of the facts that i was able to stumble upon...

1.) The Bush administration was accused by some countries that the only intention of the war in Iraq was to control its oil...

Bush admin and family denied this....

but according to the Bush's own family profile....they own the texas oil company in Texas(duh?!) hahaha.. isnt this leading to some speculations that they are using the war to have access to Iraq's oil for their own use? For what? It is said that we have used 50% of the oil reserves that the earth has, meaning once the oil is gone in the middle east..the big oil reserve that the Bush family holds in Texas can be used for their own (and the country's) intention for prosperity.

2.) Terrorism?

Just to make things short, the US announced its war on terror.
They waged war in afghanistan. They push other countries

2007-02-10 21:28:53 · 4 answers · asked by claw c 1

There never were any WMD, and saddam is dead. What is the latest reason for the war in Iraq? Right wing blowhards assert we need to stay until 'the terrorists are all killed', but it seems the US occupying Iraq is what is fueling the insurgency.
Since the objectives of the war keep changing, how will we know when we 'win'?
Right wingers angrily insist we remain in Iraq, but they seem unable to give a clear picture on what the ultimate objective might be. Sorry, but 'bringing freedom to Iraq' is not a reason to fight this war.

2007-02-10 20:09:45 · 15 answers · asked by OctopusGuy 1

i think they should be banned because it destroy the countries it breaks up the peace of nation .some peoples get alone so i think it should be banned they damage economy.

2007-02-10 19:56:45 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

With the Bush Administration's latest amendment to the war strategy for Iraq, curiously entitled "Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out", American citizens are concerned that the Iraqi people may be headed for extinction. Despite the optimistic outlook forecast by U.S. news media, there is a growing concern about the shrinking population in the middle eastern country.
"I'm worried there won't be any Iraqis left by 2009", says Thomas Harvett, a spokeperson for an Iraqi Humanitarian Coalition. "Then who will rebuild Iraq? The Americans?"

How can we work together to ensure the continuance of the Iraqi people in the face of danger? Can the Bush Administration be persuaded to show mercy?

2007-02-10 19:23:26 · 10 answers · asked by TruthIsFreedom 3

The United States, mired for four years in the Iraq war, and no end in sight, has begun to look seriously at the problem of millions of Iraqis turned refugees by the fighting -- especially those who have collaborated with the Americans.

While the 2003 US invasion sparked most of the exodus, Washington has been accused of taking little interest in the two million Iraqi who have sought refuge abroad, as well as the 1.7 million people displaced inside the country.

With 50,000 people fleeing the country each month, the war has sparked the most serious refugee crisis in the Middle East since that of the Palestinians at the creation of Israel in 1948, according to the United States government. Since the USA Government is responsible for the refugees it is suggested that the Iraqi people come to the USA ( One to two million or more ) and settle in the USA and be given homes and jobs. Americans, according to Bush, will be happy to give up their jobs and become homeless.

2007-02-10 18:55:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Iraq was broken before the US got there so I don't understand when people say "The US can't leave because they're responsible for Iraq's condition," as if our actions are the only thing that has shaped the state of that country. They were a third world country with little industry, education or peace.

Today they're a third world country with little industry, education or peace and are on the virge of what can't even be defined as a civil war. The way I see it, they're no worse off now than they were when the US intervened with Saddam's dictatorship; if anything our intervention at least made possible for them to attempt to form a democracy. We gave them a class in democracy, if half of the students were ignorant, and didn't pay attention due to hatred whose fault is that? So why is it the US' responsibility to supervise and assist in the building of an entire country?

2007-02-10 18:35:53 · 15 answers · asked by Rush_Informer01 2

from russia,america, france, briton,and spain since lets say 1998
which would include bus attacks, trains,metros and others, which would also bring into play the moscow metro attacks, the concert bombings, the theatre hostage crisis, the underground bombings in moscow, beslan, then new york attacks both on the wtc. how many people all together have actually been killed siomply trying to live and go to work, or children simply going to school.
i have never gotten an answer to this question no matter where or how often i ask it.
between the bombings froim colombia to the philipines,moscow to australia. i have always been told it wasnt that many.
i have an idea and simple figures in my head. there are many still dying daily frm terrorist attacks along with the oraqi war figures, and afganistan killed and injured from fighting it. what is the total
figure from killed and wounded from all attacks since 1998 to today
hint. it is over 25,000 just from memory.
anyone got figures

2007-02-10 18:25:45 · 4 answers · asked by pearlblackharley@yahoo.com 5

I hope and pray we stay the hell away but it sure seems like Iran is asking for war.

2007-02-10 17:54:16 · 6 answers · asked by dlln5559 2

What do you think???

2007-02-10 17:18:47 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok I consider myself a catholic. But am not happy with the pope and his staff. I mean I read stories about churches being blowned up, nuns and missionairies killed my the arabs. And when the pope opened his mouth last year about the muslims he had to apologize to them. I mean I would like to see the pope say bad Arab dont you see your ways. Lets all live in peace. But Christians in the middle east countries are leaving and population of christians there are getting smaller or becuase of the way they are treated.

I feel the pope should stand up more for his people and Christians even though they are not catholics.

2007-02-10 17:06:34 · 5 answers · asked by David W 2

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuS8WcX0qE2Ba.dLOvpbdtVIzKIX?qid=20070111171728AA507w8

Instead of nuking Iran and Iraq?

2007-02-10 16:13:11 · 10 answers · asked by karnetse 1

Now first of all some inmates are not fit mentally to fight or just b/c of there crimes it b safe to keep them in jail. Im referring to robbers, rapist, murderers, abusers, drug dealers/users, and other crimes of the sort that are not too severe. Now think, if we train and send them to the heart of the fighting, we will do away with the excessive inmate overcrowding and also the amount of funds from tax payers needed to support the system. That means more money to use for national debt or other worthwhile programs that will help improve our own well being. Not only that but it cud also prevent some crimes from happening if fear comes into the persons head that they might get sent to there own deaths for fighting in the war. Also for the inmates they will get a displine they prolly have never had and actually might be well enough to b released back into the public, that is the ones of lesser crimes. such benefits for fighting and comming back cud b reduced sentences for certain crimes.

2007-02-10 15:45:55 · 13 answers · asked by borred223 2

2007-02-10 14:55:39 · 9 answers · asked by gigiani 1

Putin says US is pushing nations to look for nukes. Does he make sense?

2007-02-10 14:34:37 · 5 answers · asked by b_prince 3

fedest.com, questions and answers