A lot of people say that Wikipedia is unreliable, but what makes it any less reliable than Britannica Encyclopedia, or MSN Encarta? I know that anyone can edit the articles on Wikipedia, but it's still people creating articles using their knowledge and sourcing information, which is what they do at Britannica or Encarta, but the only difference is they are employed by a company to do that. So why should Wikipedia be less reliable simply because regular people can edit it?
2007-08-05
04:34:24
·
21 answers
·
asked by
me
1