Why not unpaid administrative leave? Now grant it that it is usually done during a pending investigation of the person, but ultimately, despite that, isn’t it really in effect the same as a mini vacation? Plus, what if the person is guilty? It is not like they take back those free checks they gave the person - and it rarely results in the person getting fired.
So, instead, they say the person “can’t come to work” as if it is a punishment or something, (well, who wants to come to work anyways)? So, they make the employee stay home and just collect checks? Is it me, or is this concept strange to you? Or am I misunderstanding how this works? If so, please enlighten me, and if I am not, then do you agree with this procedure?
2006-11-27
09:51:15
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Answer-Me-This
5