English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

I mean if we have a "game" called Second Life in this world.. could it be possible that we are already in some other form of simulation game from the people from outside of this world?

you know what i mean?

think outside the square... what if you can put Artificial Intelligence on those characters on Second Life... how would they know WE humans exist when we are in another dimension? (ie non virtual, ie were in the physical world while theyre in the virtual world)

it could be possible you know... for all we know the universe may just aswell be the blank spaces on the hard drive. ;)

2007-11-22 02:20:40 · 9 answers · asked by deathofthefeminist. 1

For he who waits, conquers nothing but his own failure.

2007-11-22 02:13:20 · 22 answers · asked by 24fan 4

... like this one?

2007-11-22 02:08:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

thought or concept or knowledge learned, do you feel is most important to you? that you can apply to your daily life and that has helped your development in this subject?

2007-11-22 02:02:26 · 11 answers · asked by dlin333 7

no religious theories please

2007-11-22 01:57:59 · 8 answers · asked by Thankful 1

I'm not looking for any religious or historical views. I want your comments about the core content and essence of it. What do you have to say?

2007-11-22 01:46:49 · 2 answers · asked by . 1

Can someone give me a false source of knowledge? if that so, Why is it false?

2007-11-22 01:42:00 · 9 answers · asked by emsfan 1

Is religion and the prospects of life after death just sugar coating the truth? what if there is really something after life after all... and charles darwin and people like him just got it wrong?

And how do make good use of our time here on earth incase there is nothing after death. how do we harrness lifes full potential and make the rest of our lives something to remember?

2007-11-22 01:30:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

bodybuilder,intellect and great musician.

2007-11-22 01:11:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-22 01:09:46 · 11 answers · asked by Private Erin Coolidge 2

2007-11-22 01:07:57 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

what do you think??

2007-11-22 00:55:12 · 30 answers · asked by sweetness 2

I start to answer this question on Monday in my Philosophy class and so I thought I'd ask you all what you thought. Please have intelligent answers.. cos I don't like those who say 'yes obviosuly,' and so on.

2007-11-22 00:45:58 · 41 answers · asked by Shaun W 1

2007-11-22 00:45:37 · 14 answers · asked by smily 3

when you can just sleep... forever and ever.

2007-11-22 00:09:06 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-22 00:05:43 · 23 answers · asked by ? 4

undesirable unconciousness can often lead to disired concequences?

2007-11-21 23:55:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-21 23:00:20 · 12 answers · asked by Ask ME 3

2007-11-21 22:52:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-21 22:33:07 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-21 22:19:08 · 4 answers · asked by Hi 1

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Have a great day!

2007-11-21 22:15:05 · 21 answers · asked by Third P 6

Do you know or feel like your cards can be changed? And is there sense to this? Or do you feel like you can change the day but the outcome will be the same?

2007-11-21 22:02:14 · 5 answers · asked by orangie 5

If God really is omnipotent than I suppose it could be possible, but it also seems impossible. An example is if God created a stone that is so heavy that God himself could not lift it.
Just wondering, We are talking about stuff like this in philosphy right now.

2007-11-21 21:52:10 · 12 answers · asked by TBaT 4

I had asked two questions about feeling confident while debating. A few suggested I know the topic inside and out and have a firm stance on my own position.

Imagine this hypothetical situation. There are two people who are about to debate.

The first person, let us name him Adam, believes that a text supports both position A and position B, though barely supporting position A, whereas the second person, let us call her Eve, believes the text supports only position A. Adam knows both position A and position B inside and out, but remains agnostic as to which is correct because both are supported by the same text. Adam wants to persuade Eve that it is insufficient for her to stand strong in her position A because the text also supports position B and barely supports position A. Adam cannot object that the text supports position A, but he can explain it barely supports position A.

Who has the advantage? Does Eve have the advantage because she only holds to position B? Why or why not?

2007-11-21 21:46:49 · 3 answers · asked by enarchay 2

I've heard the theory that your room is a symbol of your life, and the way it makes you feel is the way your life is.

2007-11-21 21:43:05 · 11 answers · asked by lol 2

Life
your lover
yourself

2007-11-21 21:39:55 · 7 answers · asked by ? 4

2007-11-21 21:36:24 · 11 answers · asked by ? 4

fedest.com, questions and answers