This auxiliary verb qualifies a main verb for the denotation of a personal, moral or ethical responsibility. It is easy to say - I will do something good as a declaration of personal intention to choose to do something good, but when we say – I should do something good – it indicates an obligation beyond our personal right of choice.
There are things that we should do in society because they are the norms or social values; then there are religious commandments and forebodings that either we should observe, or keep from; at its best this word is mildly suggestive of a friendly advice as – you should call your husband etc. This word in fact falls between ‘must’ and open verbal assertions, like – I can work here, or I work here but. If I say - I must work here, I have no choice, and when I say – I should work here, I have either moral or ethical choice to make.
We are by nature very cautious about hearing this word from others regarding us. We do no like to hear everyone telling us what we should do, or what we shouldn’t. Because, should often makes it possible to render pieces of advice to others, which is the easiest way to assert moral superiority upon others.
Take care with the use of this potential word, as you should always keep it use for your person as – what should I do, but seldom for the purpose of forming judgemental opinions and about others.
2007-11-22 03:08:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shahid 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has meaning. It is overused. It is overused because we don't do the things we should. If we do the things we should do, we would use it far less often. It is likely that if we stopped "should"ing and started taking care of our obligations, we would have richer lives. We would probably find that eliminating "should"ing would have a profound affect on our "want"ing. We would probably being doing less of it as well. We would be doing more having.
Whew... Happy Thanksgiving!
2007-11-22 01:29:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Trina™ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course it does, otherwise the word wouldn't exist. In this world are things that we should do e.g. look after the environment, care for other people etc.
"Well who says we should do that" I hear you cry. Well quite simply... God.
And also, if we did do the things that we SHOULD do, then the world would be a better place e.g. the state of our environment would be better, there'd be no evil in the world, because everyone would care for each other.
2007-11-22 01:35:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kieran M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Should" is a presrciptive word. That is why it forms the subjunctive tense of any verb it modifies. It is not descriptive of anything otherwise it would be in the indicative mode.
What that means is that it recomends rather than describing anything.
2007-11-22 02:17:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by KGB 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well you think that it ought to when you consider how we all use this word indiscriminately. And without even understanding what it really means.
2007-11-22 01:16:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It shows the person has some issues
2007-11-22 02:36:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
should:
1. pt. of shall.
2. (used to express condition): Were he to arrive, I should be pleased.
3. must; ought (used to indicate duty, propriety, or expediency): You should not do that.
4. would (used to make a statement less direct or blunt): I should think you would apologize.
2007-11-22 01:22:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It actually means, "I am not happy with What IS"!
2007-11-22 01:12:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Premaholic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It could.
2007-11-22 01:37:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Regwah 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"should" means that "this" or "is" is not enough.
2007-11-22 01:54:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋