English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - December 2006

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Thanks. Much appreciated.

2006-12-06 13:22:41 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have heard it said and it seems to be true that love is an act more than an emotion. If this is true then you can love even those you despise with an act of good will. Do you think this is true and advisable?

2006-12-06 13:19:41 · 13 answers · asked by Mad Mac 7

Romance or Companionship?

2006-12-06 13:13:25 · 12 answers · asked by jane c 3

I mean if any of us were really smart we would have real lives and not waste any time on this dumb website!

2006-12-06 12:59:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need as many "Weaknesses" or bad qualities of humans in this time today. All ive got is war. NEED HELP QUICK!!

2006-12-06 12:44:42 · 18 answers · asked by jaredcubfan 1

2006-12-06 12:42:32 · 22 answers · asked by me 3

2006-12-06 12:42:02 · 11 answers · asked by rhcpfan18 1

2006-12-06 12:34:21 · 22 answers · asked by Led*Zep*Babe 5

2006-12-06 12:25:51 · 6 answers · asked by lindsey f 1

I am trying to come up with some good topics for my senior honors thesisfor philosophy. I know in the end it is my decision but what do you think of these topics:

How secret societies have played a role in the development of modern political philosophy.

Why Plato's cave theory is correct.

Was there one central philosophy that all others were built upon?

That is all I have right now, but please feel free to add some ideas if you have one. I would like my emphasis to be on classical ideas, political philosophy, or philosophy of religion.

Thanks in advance.

2006-12-06 12:25:47 · 4 answers · asked by operaphantom2003 4

2006-12-06 12:23:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think this phrase may have a lot more to it than people give it credit for.
What are your ideas on "The Path of Least Resistance" and what does it mean to you?

2006-12-06 12:21:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a deep question and yet the answer is simple.It should go without saying that the context of this overturning was during antiquity, before Christ.In the event of a surprising answer about which I have no clue, that should accompany a proof.

2006-12-06 12:20:21 · 2 answers · asked by debussyyee 3

if so what do you think of it? do you think the world would be a better place if we tried to impiment what is said?

2006-12-06 12:10:00 · 10 answers · asked by tricia l 2

me, i'd give Friedrich Nietzsche a few superman superman comic books!

2006-12-06 12:09:59 · 9 answers · asked by biodegradable insane asylum 5

I have to prove that one person can't make a SIGNIFICANT difference in a DISASTER for a debate class tomorrow and I don't know how!!

2006-12-06 12:03:11 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

How do we know..? THAT someone somewhere is actually experiencing this at this moment in time! Being stuck in the exactly same day every day BUT this time will never get out of it?

Only answer this if you have seen the film

2006-12-06 12:01:13 · 10 answers · asked by ? 3

2006-12-06 11:54:43 · 9 answers · asked by docteur 1

why or why not?

2006-12-06 11:45:59 · 28 answers · asked by enki 4

2006-12-06 11:39:40 · 23 answers · asked by ? 2

Think about this! We have all (some more than others) imagined a better world (or life) where nothing sad or evil occurs.

Perhaps this is death. So when we think we die, we really are born into this beautiful world (or life)?

2006-12-06 11:21:00 · 18 answers · asked by ? 3

2006-12-06 11:20:31 · 9 answers · asked by jasonhenrybaker2 1

someday you will faced the unknown

2006-12-06 11:17:54 · 8 answers · asked by harryn 1

2006-12-06 11:10:40 · 13 answers · asked by Dan 4

2006-12-06 11:05:32 · 12 answers · asked by tjexplorer2013 1

I don't seem to be able to succeed in my life however hard I try, how can I be happy when so many things are wrong?

2006-12-06 10:32:01 · 29 answers · asked by Dan 4

Size is relative; just answer subjectively.

2006-12-06 10:17:52 · 10 answers · asked by NietzcheanCowboy 3

Our distant ancestors did not understand the world in which they lived. They saw female animals giving birth, along with their own females, and probably concluded that the universe was 'born' out of a female God - the pagan Earth Godess. Later, as men took charge of society, Gods replaced, or were added to, the Earth Godess myth. Other cultures worshipped the Sun as the bringer of life. Still others developed strange variants of their own.

BUT, could an intelligent species bypass these tens-of-thousands of years of mythology and develop a purley scientific explanation of existence WITHOUT going through the 'religious age' first?

Can you offer a path of cultural development a species would need to take in order to reach, say, our own level of scientiic knowledge without having developed religon? A culture in which spirituality has ALWAYS been satisfied by science?

Or, is this process - religion first, then science later - the only logical path intelligent species can follow?

2006-12-06 10:13:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers