Philosophy - September 2006

2006-09-06 09:58:17 · 28 answers · asked by kristine 2

2006-09-06 09:57:25 · 13 answers · asked by muskaan 1

If you mean murdering me, or comitting lewd acts, that's all acceptable. There is no possible answer that I will reject.

2006-09-06 09:35:59 · 16 answers · asked by Pierre 2

Most moderns seem to view unconditional love as a good thing. What do you think? Could it be immoral to show others unconditional love?

2006-09-06 09:24:40 · 11 answers · asked by sokrates 4

Are you ready to leave this world right now?

Don't you want to leave it all behind and move on. No one will remember you, and go on to the next world. Does this world satisfy you or make you depressed. Don't you want to leave all of your problems behind. There is another world out there waiting for you with your name on it. This is only one world, you will go to another world.

2006-09-06 09:22:30 · 26 answers · asked by Jabaris H 2

I've read about nihilism and I'm very fond of Friedrich Nietzsche, but I've been inquiring about neo-nihilisim and have only been able to stumble on it's "Manifesto". I think that it's inconsistent based on what I've read, but maybe you all can shed some light on this subject.

2006-09-06 09:10:00 · 3 answers · asked by Tyler Durden 1

2006-09-06 09:05:31 · 30 answers · asked by JusticeManEsq 5

Would save a spider who was hogin the rim in toilet?Or piss him away to hell.I saved the sucker and let him out in garden.

2006-09-06 08:59:58 · 24 answers · asked by Harry J 2

peace, your dream, aim... your family, your dog... anything

2006-09-06 08:38:23 · 69 answers · asked by Anonymous

It means to refer back to a past that never was - kind of like refering to a golden age often in art and architecture.
Its one of those long german philosophy words.
Please help then i can sleep tonight.

2006-09-06 08:35:04 · 9 answers · asked by Bebe 4

2006-09-06 08:25:43 · 16 answers · asked by lilboy007 1

In laboratories, mice or guinea pigs and sometimes even other animals are used as "research material". Do you think we as humans have the right to perform such an act in the name of science? For our own advancement, perhaps?

2006-09-06 08:13:23 · 15 answers · asked by anidha_v 1

2006-09-06 07:41:49 · 20 answers · asked by socrates 6

2006-09-06 07:30:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

my father said to me
join in the army is time to you to become a man
I have 527 days on duty but I believe to become a man
you don't need to become a soldier
there is nothing honorable or glorious to kill other human being

for be a man you need to work hard for your family
and your country..

I am wrong?

2006-09-06 07:07:00 · 17 answers · asked by Danny 2

somone said that to me many times and am curious.

2006-09-06 06:32:44 · 4 answers · asked by ? 6

they say follow you're heart but how do you differentiate ur mind n heart anyway? like i just dont know when my heart's tellin me to do something or whether its my head?

2006-09-06 06:25:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Human creature

2006-09-06 06:15:48 · 18 answers · asked by s.Hidayath 1

In creating a government, should people be mostly free with minimal restrictions (the underlying assumption being that they will act responsibly), or should there be a law for as many possible evils as the government can think of, thus creating a society where there is minimal freedom and maximum safety (the underlying assumption being that people will not act responsibly)? If you think it's somewhere in between, where do you think the line should be drawn?

Use as many examples and be as specific as you'd like. This is something I always wonder about, with the US government's trend over the past 50 or so years toward taking responsibility for the citizens.

Thanks!

2006-09-06 06:03:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

You know that scene near the beginning of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" when Indy almost gets crushed by that big boulder? Well, what if that boulder was a big turd instead?

2006-09-06 05:14:11 · 6 answers · asked by andrewtm78 2

2006-09-06 04:53:30 · 14 answers · asked by KOHLI V 3

including but not limited to - drug use, sexual preferences, religion etc.

2006-09-06 04:48:52 · 24 answers · asked by marleyjane420 1

Enlightenment is knowing that enlightenment is an illusion. Similar to "The first step in knowing everything is knowing that you never will" - similar but with different condentations.

2006-09-06 04:37:59 · 12 answers · asked by marleyjane420 1

Enlightenment is knowing that enlightenment is an illusion. Similar to "The first step in knowing everything is knowing that you never will" - similar but with different condentations.

2006-09-06 04:37:41 · 7 answers · asked by marleyjane420 1

how and when did the idea of value start?

2006-09-06 04:21:11 · 4 answers · asked by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5

2006-09-06 04:19:14 · 17 answers · asked by kevin d 4

If you were immortal, indestructable, had no need for food or drink, and never aged, would you:

a) Do absolutely everything;
b) Do absolutely nothing.

2006-09-06 03:55:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

If nothing is random, then our very thoughts and actions must be controlled by some prior cause, for example our genes.
This means we are like robots. Any arguments agaisnt this?

2006-09-06 03:36:19 · 13 answers · asked by Rhodri H 1

2006-09-06 03:31:11 · 37 answers · asked by Sky Walker 1

2006-09-06 03:29:07 · 10 answers · asked by Monette a 1