Philosophy - July 2006

My friend and i were having a conversation the last day and i said as long as your happy nothing else matters and he said he was having too much fun.i am a bit confused by it looking back.he doesnt drink or smoke or even take any drugs.i dont know what he could of meant by it.so is it possible to have too much fun

2006-07-25 02:05:54 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-25 01:55:12 · 3 answers · asked by amazing_sweet_angel 1

Premise A: God is all.
Premise B: Consciousness presupposes a subject and an object.

Conclusion: God has no consciousness.

2006-07-25 01:17:15 · 11 answers · asked by sauwelios@yahoo.com 6

2006-07-25 01:14:13 · 8 answers · asked by cory55355 2

2006-07-25 01:11:47 · 8 answers · asked by cory55355 2

2006-07-25 01:04:16 · 16 answers · asked by ♥♥chocolate♥♥ 1

i don't understand why people should die,
i know it sounds pretty funny, (i'm really serious u know) i don't want to accept this, and should i believe GOD or something like that to live longer and have a good time after my death ?

2006-07-25 01:03:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-25 00:51:09 · 12 answers · asked by Mr 2

I forgot what I was sent here to do.

2006-07-25 00:41:55 · 13 answers · asked by eternity 3

2006-07-25 00:41:25 · 3 answers · asked by uma s 2

2006-07-25 00:37:46 · 14 answers · asked by zigzagidiot 3

I think in all of us who do believe in "GOD" we hv our own experiences when it comes to having "faith",when & in what state have u strongly used yr faith in achieving something & "GOD" GAVE IT 2 U?

2006-07-25 00:24:30 · 4 answers · asked by razino 1

Out of the evil of the holocost came the good of the state of israell out of the good of this came the evil of the middle east conflict. Out of the good of america suppling arms to the afganistan mugadhdeen come the evil of al qadia so can can good in theory come out of the evil of al qadia. So can good come out of evil and evil come out of good

2006-07-25 00:24:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Parmenides said lightness was positive. Kundera brings it under consideration in his novel. What do you think?

2006-07-25 00:11:13 · 5 answers · asked by diasporas 3

Pragmatism is the moral principle that the ends justifies the means Politically countries opperate pragmatically they will do what ever will get them the end they wont all that matters is the end not what gets you there, The means does not matter for the goverment pragmatice even if this means is immoral Does this make pragmatism an immoral morality - where you can do absolutly anything to get what end result you wont. If so does this means that hgovrments that operate pragmaticaly are immoral because they dont casre what they have to do to get what they wont

2006-07-25 00:10:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

This could be a litteral mirror or information recieved when reading an image or perhaps the mirror within.

2006-07-24 23:56:43 · 17 answers · asked by rvn 1

2006-07-24 23:44:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is a country acting morally good if in the persuite of its moral principles it take these very principles away from another country. Can a country in the peruite of its freedom take the fredom of another country and that be morally good

2006-07-24 23:42:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 23:38:44 · 6 answers · asked by amit p 1

Is everything a country does to protect one of its moral principles all way good Can a country do absolutley anything to protects its moral principles and what ever it does is allways good In other words whatever a country does for a moral cause is this allways moral

2006-07-24 23:38:32 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 23:37:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 23:35:15 · 15 answers · asked by jtb4758 1

is it morally ok to act immorally to protect a moral principle.
Can a country behave immorally to protect lets say its moral principle of freedom or to protect national security

2006-07-24 23:34:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 23:25:42 · 21 answers · asked by towatchwant 1

What are your thoughts on this theory? I find it to be rather frieghtening really.

For those of you who do not know what eternal recurrence is:
one day a person would be born with the same thought-processes as himself, and that the same applies to every other individual.

2006-07-24 23:09:12 · 8 answers · asked by MojoFace 2

Gimme your view.

2006-07-24 23:05:32 · 2 answers · asked by canuseeme 1

From one fertilised egg a DNA molecule, if uncoiled, is about a nanometer thick and a meter long.

If it is an inanimate object, how does it "know" how to replicate itself trillions of times without a mistake and make a dog or a tree or even me?

2006-07-24 23:00:35 · 16 answers · asked by Nothing to say? 3

2006-07-24 23:00:25 · 18 answers · asked by Dream 1

2006-07-24 22:52:02 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-24 22:50:53 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous