History - March 2007

This is for a History Class

2007-03-21 04:13:40 · 3 answers · asked by tamara_pritchard 1

what is the advantages and disadvantages..... how did the europeans like affect the aboroginals lives ?? PLS HELPPP THAANKKKS SOO MUCH

2007-03-21 03:57:26 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-21 03:52:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Describe the historical significance (in details) of Timur Lenk, Timur the Lame, or Tamerlane.

How can his politics be justified by his religious beliefs?

How might the life and actions of this man help the world to understand the Christian/Muslim conflict that exists in the world today?

Please include as many examples as possible.

2007-03-21 03:36:22 · 1 answers · asked by vic112987 2

Does anybody know the meaning of it?

Is it a Japanese word?

2007-03-21 03:31:52 · 9 answers · asked by Charles R 1

Any historical figure, in the sense that they receive more modern day "coverage" than they deserve. Regarding what they achieved, both positive or negative.

2007-03-21 03:21:16 · 8 answers · asked by Bayern Fan 5

Did the Hebrews of Judea perhaps have similar ritual as the pagan ritual?

2007-03-21 02:52:09 · 17 answers · asked by Charles R 1

2007-03-21 02:41:39 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why did they choose that time for Passover?

2007-03-21 02:35:19 · 7 answers · asked by Charles R 1

2007-03-21 02:11:39 · 6 answers · asked by Charles R 1

thought of as being from a "lower class, or an uneducated class?" Now, I know that there are some Southern people with accents that are not considered to be "dumb Southerners," but these are almost always people with money or education. The Civil War, or War of Northern Aggression, caused the South to move into a "backward" era that exists even to this day. This poverty still exists in the South, causing people to "make fun of" Southern accents. Desirable accents almost always follows money. Undesirable accents almost always follow poverty. Wht do you think?

2007-03-21 02:09:38 · 12 answers · asked by Bluebeard 1

2007-03-21 01:55:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

The year is 2007. The irony cannot be lost on those who study history. Exactly 250 years back, in 1757, a young British man, Robert Clive, had stood in mango forests, with a scroll, a map, a sword, and wondered how he was going to pave the way for a small band of people to control a vast sub continent, incredibly rich and diverse. A land of whose riches he had read about in Britain, and had often dreamed of. The land of wealth, but inner disjunction, between common people and the ruling elite.
http://www.landacquisition.blogspot.com/

2007-03-21 01:40:50 · 3 answers · asked by New India 2

2007-03-21 01:34:25 · 1 answers · asked by R.lakshmi kanth K 1

2007-03-21 01:27:52 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

How did the development of religions such as Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism transformed politics, society, and culture in regions where they developed and spread?

2007-03-21 01:02:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-21 00:40:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-21 00:29:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-21 00:08:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-21 00:04:15 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

please also give references so ican see for myself.. thank you...

2007-03-20 23:50:51 · 2 answers · asked by melissa_north23 1

2007-03-20 23:46:06 · 5 answers · asked by pigslip_143 1

The great conqueror Tamerlane was reported to have said that militarism should be confined to only one race: The Turks. Before him, the Frankish author of the gesta franconum has claimed that the Turks were the greatest warriors ever. Again, many Europeans (among them Chevalier Folard and Napoleon Bonaparte) have described the Turks and Circassians as the bravest and greatest warriors in the whole world.

From that we could conclude that the Turks were known to be as the greatest warriors in the Middle Ages; even to some centuries in the New Ages...why is this so? Was fighting ability and chivalry that superior among the Turkic races?? Was it a monopoly of chivalry??

2007-03-20 23:43:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-20 23:39:31 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-20 23:27:47 · 1 answers · asked by Lai Yu Zeng 4

2007-03-20 23:26:35 · 4 answers · asked by Lai Yu Zeng 4

Mahatmi Gandhi one remarked "I like you're Christ but I do not like you're Christians." .

He didn't like Christians (I am assuming due to their actions in history) but he worshiped and admired Muslims - the same people who were responsible for the murder of nearly 100 million hindus at one point in History and the rape of an even greater number of hindu women. He had no problem praising the Muslims, despite the fact that their actions in history had been just as despicable and sikening as those of Christians.

I agree that the Christians aren't perfect, but Hindus suffered much much much more at the hands of islam than we did at the hands of Christianity. The biggest genocide in history was that which was undertaken by Muslims against Hindus; hindu Temples were all bulldosed and replaced with Mosques and many hindus were forced to become Muslim. They became 2nd class.

Do you agree with me that by making such a comment, Gandhi was historically blind as well as a hypocrite???

2007-03-20 23:23:43 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-20 23:16:41 · 5 answers · asked by terry m 2

sorry people another question on this french rev document.
it says in it that the cahier of the 3rd estate wants to reduce the incredible number of petty assassins who with the aid of a wig and a licence and often only the razor undertake to treat the most complicated of illnesses and to whom the blood of the people seems to of been abandoned.
am i right in thinking the petty assassins were quack doctors??

2007-03-20 22:46:51 · 4 answers · asked by womble 5

2007-03-20 22:43:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous