English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

History - March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities History

2007-03-02 22:55:06 · 17 answers · asked by Douglass B 1

He lives in Port-au-Prince and his father oversees 50 churches in Haiti and travels to the United States for Religious conventions, etc. atleast once a year.

2007-03-02 22:38:30 · 3 answers · asked by Stacy J 1

I'm really not sure it's become so inbued with ledgend like robin hood and king arthur that it's become fiction. However could there really have been a battle for troy?

2007-03-02 22:37:59 · 2 answers · asked by Mcpirate 2

what were the real reasons for it.

2007-03-02 21:53:25 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

So many people say it was the war to free the slaves, but I read the North side had slaves and was the first to legalize slavery. So what was it all really about and why is the romantic viewpoint taught in schools?

2007-03-02 20:59:29 · 12 answers · asked by Dan G 3

2007-03-02 20:58:46 · 8 answers · asked by volley 2

I know they did but i just really want to make sure.

2007-03-02 20:47:26 · 17 answers · asked by kiis0 x3 2

2007-03-02 20:35:32 · 4 answers · asked by roki 1

I see this name in many places,i know he must be very famous. But who he is? plz tell me

2007-03-02 20:20:51 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-02 19:43:21 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-02 19:40:13 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-02 19:31:38 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am most interested in the Georgian and Regency periods. Could then a son be disinherited by his father, although the child had been born legitimately, with his parents married? (Possible reasons I think of, why the father would want to renounce the child, could be he suspects the child isn't his, or that the child is born incapacitated). Would under these circumstances the child still inherit the title and the estates after his father's death?

2007-03-02 19:03:15 · 4 answers · asked by Adnana 2

The period I'm interested in is the beginning of the 19th century. I know that titles and entailed property were usually passed on, after the peer's death, to his eldest legitimate son (if he had one), but what if the father would have become very angry with his son? Is there any valid reason at all that the peer could have used to disinherit his son or, in any case, prevent him from inheriting the title?

2007-03-02 18:53:43 · 1 answers · asked by Adnana 2

Are they also called Four Father's?

2007-03-02 18:20:42 · 6 answers · asked by Lee Edward 1

Hi, I'm Lian Ju. I would like to ask some questions regarding the coins i have. Recently when my mother took out (set right) the relic from my father defunct (dead in year 1963). Among the gold coins, there is a coin in which makes me curios. The date on the coin was 1006, on one side there is a picture of a person riding a horse. At the other side it says " INI BARANG PER.HIAZAN BOEAT PAKE INIDIA. The coin is made from copper. Who is the figures on this coins? Thank you very much for your help to identiy this coin.

2007-03-02 17:53:19 · 2 answers · asked by lian 1

Who would he first have swept to the ground and do you think there would have been a world left today if he had the soul power over atomic technology?!?Just your thoughts of the idea would be appreciated!!!

2007-03-02 17:40:47 · 7 answers · asked by volley 2

2007-03-02 17:26:50 · 3 answers · asked by tatsuya n 1

Would there not be a Cold War if the US could accept Soviet need for a security buffer zone? Or was Eastern Europe the first stage in the process of the global expansion of an internationalist ideology?

2007-03-02 17:00:16 · 5 answers · asked by lol 1

Hey!
I am looking for a good picture on the intenet which displays the pharoh slaves working to create the pyamids.
Does anyone know where I can look or have a site that leads me to this picture



Thanks a bunch!

2007-03-02 16:13:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hi! I'm a 12th grade Student. My essay is about the Reconstruction Period. What do u think of it? How much do u rate it from 1-100? Are there any errors? What are they?
Thank you so Much!

Reconstruction was the process in U.S. history from 1865-1877 that attempted to resolve the issues of the American Civil War when both the Confederacy and slavery were destroyed. At the end of the Civil War , the defeated South was a ruined land. The physical destruction wrought by the invading Union forces was enormous, and the old social and economic order founded on slavery had collapsed completely, with nothing to replace it. The 11 Confederate states somehow had to be restored to their positions in the Union and provided with loyal governments, and the role of the emancipated slaves in Southern society had to be defined.

The Civil War ended on April 9, 1865, when Confederate general Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union general Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse in Virginia. The North's victory settled two important issues. First, it established that states were not allowed to leave, or secede from, the United States. Second, it put an end to slavery throughout the country. But the end of the war also raised a whole new set of issues. For example, federal lawmakers had to decide whether to punish the Confederate leaders, what process to use to readmit the Southern states to the Union, and how much assistance to provide in securing equal rights for the freed slaves.

Because these complicated issues carried a great deal of importance for the future of the nation, Reconstruction was a time of great political and social turmoil. President Andrew Johnson who took office after Abraham Lincoln, controlled the earliest Reconstruction efforts. But the U.S. Congress felt that the president's Reconstruction policies were too lenient (easy) on the South. Led by members of the Republican Party, Congress enacted stricter Reconstruction policies beginning in 1866 and sent in federal troops to enforce them. The ongoing dispute between Johnson and Congress led to the president's impeachment in 1868.

On Mar. 2, 1867, Congress enacted the Reconstruction Act, which, supplemented later by three related acts, divided the South (except Tennessee) into five military districts in which the authority of the army commander was supreme. Johnson continued to oppose congressional policy, and when he insisted on the removal of the radical Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton , in defiance of the Tenure of Office Act , the House impeached him (Feb., 1868). The radicals in the Senate fell one vote short of convicting him (May), but by this time Johnson's program had been effectively scuttled.

Under the terms of the Reconstruction Acts, new state constitutions were written in the South. By Aug., 1868, six states (Arkansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, and Florida) had been readmitted to the Union, having ratified the Fourteenth Amendment as required by the first Reconstruction Act. The four remaining unreconstructed states—Virginia, Mississippi, Texas, and Georgia—were readmitted in 1870 after ratifying the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the Fifteenth Amendment, which guaranteed the black man's right to vote.


By 1876 only Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana remained under Republican domination. The Republican presidential candidate that year, Rutherford B. Hayes , promised to alleviate conditions in the South, but the feeling there had already led to the formation of the "solid South" in support of his Democratic opponent, Samuel J. Tilden . In those three states the presidential contest was the occasion for a determined effort to throw off Republican rule, and on their electoral votes (and on one disputed electoral vote in Oregon) hung the fate of the famous disputed election of 1876. It is practically certain that at least one of the three gave a majority, and thus the presidency, to Tilden, but two sets of returns were sent in from each of the three states. A specially constituted electoral commission (composed of eight Republicans and seven Democrats) accepted the Republican returns, and Hayes was given the presidency.

Reconstruction officially ended as all federal troops were withdrawn from the South. White rule was restored, and black people were over time deprived of many civil and political rights and their economic position remained depressed. The radicals' hopes for a basic reordering of the social and economic structure of the South, beyond the abolition of slavery, died. The results, instead, were the one-party "solid South" and increased racial bitterness.

2007-03-02 16:13:00 · 15 answers · asked by US Cutie 3

Citing specific examples, state where certain people have had power and abused that power which lead to death, theft, corruption, or any other negative effects. Be specific and ELABORATE AND CITE SOURCES AND SPECIFIC EVENTS.

2007-03-02 16:06:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm just curious ...

2007-03-02 15:42:15 · 2 answers · asked by kittie22ro 2

2007-03-02 15:30:15 · 3 answers · asked by Gurlie 1

fedest.com, questions and answers