1. Unity is not whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.
2. Unity would not be whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.
3. Unity could not be whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.
4. Whatever could not be as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment could not be unity.
Among 1, 2, 3 & 4,
a. Which is the most misleading?
b. Which is the least misleading?
c. Which is the most direct statement?
d. Which is grammatically correct?
e. Which is logically correct?
f. Which could be disproved?
g. Which is most practical?
2007-01-19
18:53:39
·
2 answers
·
asked by
The Knowledge Server
1
in
Philosophy