Which is the least misleading statement?

Question

1. Unity is not whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.

2. Unity would not be whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.

3. Unity could not be whatever is not as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment.

4. Whatever could not be as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment could not be unity.

Among 1, 2, 3 & 4,
a. Which is the most misleading?
b. Which is the least misleading?
c. Which is the most direct statement?
d. Which is grammatically correct?
e. Which is logically correct?
f. Which could be disproved?
g. Which is most practical?

Answer 1

a.4
b.1
c.3
d.4
e.3
f.1
g.4

[i am sorry, that's how i understand that...xx]

Answer 2

a. All of the above.
The rest are 6 more questions, which will cost you.
You do seem pretty hung up on that statement, hon. You've asked the first one a couple times already.