So many people have referred me to the bible stating it is "truth."
Normally, hear say isn't the best evidence in court but when it comes to religion, it's 100% accurate.
When I discuss "why" on certain religious topics that often fail logic, I'm told to "believe" or that "I just need to believe," say, in Jesus.
Do the religious, or atheist, for that matter, as they often lack evidence themselves, understand the difference between "Belief" and actual "knowledge?" Why is it so many substitute belief for fact? Why do they not test these "beliefs" more objectively? Why is it ok to just settle on "belief" and act like it's truth?
2007-09-13
04:41:13
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Corvus
5
in
Religion & Spirituality