Have a look at this question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoQ8hafa0klsdIjQtHvOzajsy6IX?qid=20070813113520AAnzdHP
I asked Y!A libs why they were so opposed to the statements of the President regarding justification for attacking Iraq. Strangely enough, the answers turned into a Bush Bashing frenzy.
Trouble was, the quotes were from Clinton, not Bush.
Most libs ran and hid. A few came back and tried to squirm out of it, claiming that what was true in '98 was a lie in '03. that being the case, one would think that the Clinton administration would have made a declaration of success in Iraq. That never came, and even in '02 and '03, Dems joined in near universal acknowledgment that Saddam was a threat and regime change was the policy.
So, why are the Y!A libs in the link above such hypocrities?
Does it point to a much greater trend, that Y!A Libs place party above principle...all the time, regardless of the issue?
2007-08-14
05:56:27
·
18 answers
·
asked by
?
6
in
Politics