Ok... When Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan perform bad ''outside'' the subcontinent, most of the commentators and cricket experts tend to say that Asian teams are not as good outside the subcontinent as when they're playing in the sub'conti or the home soil. But isn't this the same as that white teams play bad cricket outside their territory and play well in their home soils? Why can't they or don't they say/admit that? Ex - When England plays terrible cricket in Asia, they talk about this subcontinent conditions. But when an Asian team plays bad cricket in England it is because the white team is exceptional , according to them, not because the Asians are not used to cold weather or their conditions conditions,. But when Sri Lanka trashed England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team's performace. Isn't this funny?
2007-07-05
17:07:53
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Teejay
5
in
Cricket