Ok... When Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan perform bad ''outside'' the subcontinent, most of the commentators and cricket experts tend to say that Asian teams are not as good outside the subcontinent as when they're playing in the sub'conti or the home soil. But isn't this the same as that white teams play bad cricket outside their territory and play well in their home soils? Why can't they or don't they say/admit that? Ex - When England plays terrible cricket in Asia, they talk about this subcontinent conditions. But when an Asian team plays bad cricket in England it is because the white team is exceptional , according to them, not because the Asians are not used to cold weather or their conditions conditions,. But when Sri Lanka trashed England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team's performace. Isn't this funny?
2007-07-05 17:07:53 · 12 answers · asked by Teejay 5 in Sports ➔ Cricket
they are jelous of Asians.
they wont accept that Asians are better than them.
pls dont get upset,
this is the nature of the WHITE.
We cant change chem.
2007-07-05 19:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by friend 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I respect to your ideas. I think they do not like to admire black skin nations. They need to dominate the cricket world. However, they cannot do that. Mainly I see this kind of ideas in the England and Australian. Nevertheless, Australia is very good cricketing nation. But England is very poor cricketing nation. They know they cannot adapt to the subcontinent conditions. Then they use to describe pitches as “very sluggish pitch”, “Slow pitch”. What did Sri Lankans in the England in their soil? They hammered England bowlers. I like the Sri Lankan approach to these things. I like if other Asians nation try to do the same. Especially England needs some hammering to stop these words. To do that, Asian players also should improve their skills to play well under swinging and bouncy conditions. They these white people would nothing to say. I like if Monty Panesar, Sajid Mahammod, Bopara, Jeethan Patel, Owish Shah play for India, Pakistan or Bangladesh.
2016-05-19 04:04:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Best question , after long time in this catigory.......~
ever heard of .... "Neo-Imperialism"
The new method Whites have found to impose their"
BOSSY" attitude is this .ex: Bush & America)
They have tendency to commit any shameless scheme,
in order to win .
when Sri Lanka humiliated England 5-0, they critisized the British teams' poor performace than praising the Sri Lankan team.That easily qualifies those commentator s as
~~~~~~~~~"Sheer ,Hypocrites" ~~~~~~~~
Once shamless Australian Prime -Minister
Howard,Made a comment on Muralitharan as " Chucker"
that proved every ausie is qualified to be their ancestral inheritance. that is ex-convicts and making Crimes.
Australia decends from British ex-convicts,
if you dont know.
please ask anybody who knows lil bit of world history.
They were ship -dropped by British ships .
so both people are the same.
Making Crimes ,easy for them cuz, theyhave those GENES in their, BLOOD
2007-07-06 23:24:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
it isnt funny its being partial and racist
there have been a number of instances where asian players have been punished severly for small offences but white players have got away scot free for more serious offences
like when atherton was found rubbing the ball with a bottle cap no one made a big issue out of it but when darryl hair felt the ball condition had been altered he punished the pakistan team severly
also indian players r punished for excessive appealing but australians r not even questioned for sledging
during the india-australia series in india that india won slater caught the ball which had bounced before him but kept insisting he had caught it and even fought with rahul dravid but the umpires did not punish him
2007-07-05 22:09:41 · answer #4 · answered by dan brown 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
***i fully agree with you dude.
thanks for da idea.
white people or not >astralia & england both fans are same
cuz both decend from same origin
one is bad the other worst
eng & OZ i mean
they are mean when in cricket.
bad old bullies.
but in 1996 sri lanka taught them a lesson.
2007 world cup> A-s-s-t-r-a-l-i-a won by cheating.
so who cares what cheaters say?
2007-07-08 03:19:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
sorry dan brown i will quote you.
it isnt funny its being partial and racist
there have been a number of instances where asian players have been punished severly for small offences but white players have got away scot free for more serious offences
i coppied it coz me belongs to oz-booruwo
2007-07-06 07:57:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you're the only racist around here. How dare you talk about "white teams" - everyone would be up in arms if someone started going on about "brownish-grey" teams or "black" teams.
2007-07-08 07:32:45 · answer #7 · answered by ours_blanc_71 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
a bit funny but not that much...
i think it is the nature of cricket fans that when their favourite team loses one or more matches or a series they critsize alot...so just enjoy.... but the cricketer should take it seriously ...they can improve their performance by these critisim....if they wanna do so...
2007-07-06 02:41:35 · answer #8 · answered by *-* East Beauty *-* 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
when you guys are actually good enough to call yourselves world champions at any form of cricket without crying and whinging come and SEE ME! just more poor excuses why you aren't good enough,fact- wins= points in world rankings try winning first before you start crying
2007-07-07 05:12:30 · answer #9 · answered by FORKY 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Very Well said master Joe
these bufoons are good for nothing to cricket.
they are so racial.
2007-07-06 07:53:49 · answer #10 · answered by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋