The human eye is so complex that Darwin himself, even with his limited knowledge of chemistry, saw the human eye as an enormous problem for his theory.
Evolutionist F. Hitching was still pondering this in a 1982 book entitled The Neck of the Giraffe, "Is it really plausible that thousands upon thousands of lucky chance mutations happened coincidentally so that the lens and the retina, which cannot work without each other, evolved in synchrony? What survival value can there be in an eye that doesn't see?"
Does anyone feel that survival of intermediate species poses any problem for the evolutionary model?
Thanks in andvance for your answers.
2007-07-05
14:06:35
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Graham
5
in
Religion & Spirituality