A few decades ago it was the onset of the next ice age.
Then we needed to save the whales.
Then the rainforests were at the forefront.
Now, it is global warming.
I understand that everyone has a cause that they feel passionate about. Whether it is AIDS research, famine, or your local PTA, whatever it may be. The doomsdayers have had their causes over the years too that must be addressed NOW in order to save all living creatures. The truth is, there are much more immediate and potentially devistating events, like a stray meteor taking out all living things on earth, that receive little to no attention from the doomsdayers--and are grossly underfunded to boot.
Why the focus on timely negatives?
2007-05-15
04:38:34
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Cowboy_Junkie
2
in
Global Warming