Regardless of the reality that there are lots of researchers on both sides of the argument that make valid points for and against the theory (I'm not doing your research for you so go find out what is there on both sides yourself) why is it discussed so much in a political context?
When someone finds a new drug that benefits mankind, it isn't political...it is tested, reported, confirmed and everyone gets on board.
When a new planet is discovered...it isn't debated, it is observed, located, confirmed and everyone gets on board.
When advances in robotics are developed...it isn't debated, it is designed, developed, tested and put into production and everyone gets on board.
When a new gene is identified, it isn't debated, it is observed, tested, reported, confirmed and everyone gets on board.
However in the case of those that believe global warming is fact, it is not reported and confirmed...it is debated in political context....WHY?
2007-04-03
06:36:54
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics