One that doesn't rely on circular strawman reasoning like "if a watch has a maker, then everything else has a maker", arguments that result from a complete misunderstanding of evolution like "if humans came from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys", or arguments that take things out of context like "if scientists disagree on how evolution occured, than evolution itself must be false". There are many reasons why these arguments are easily shot down. Many complex things like snowflakes aren't directly created, but formed by natural processes. New landforms have been observed to be created by geological processes. Manmade things like watches obviously can't evolve since they don't reproduce and aren't part of nature. Evolution is not about replacing one life form with another, because of divergence and common ancestors. Also, scientists have disagreements in all areas of science, not just evolution.
2007-03-26
19:01:53
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality