Before the Supreme court right now, is a case where 19 year old Victor Harris refused to pull over for police, accelerating to over 100 mph, AND hitting a police scar in theprocess, along with wreckless driving, yet when bumped and his car was ran off the road and hit a pole, resulting in Harris becoming a quadrupolegic (unable to walk now), LOWER courts have ruled in favor that it was the police who were in the wrong here--for not letting him go, and using unreasonable force to someone who didnt have a criminal past.
Does this piss you off?
What laws are police to enforce then, if they cant get these idiots who run away off the streets?
How was law enforcement to know he didnt have a hostage with him, for not wanting to stop? What about the safety of the victim
Yet the lower courts ruled that unreasonable force WAS used here?
So does that mean if you are a bank robber all you have to do is accelerate past 100 MPH to get away?
This pisses me off does it piss you off?
2007-02-25
00:33:33
·
4 answers
·
asked by
writersbIock2006
5
in
Law Enforcement & Police