I followed a link to an article 'Refuting' evolution. I read this:
------------------
Whether subjected to mutation or not, the brain is not the producer of thought. Large or small, more or less convoluted, the brain consists of neurons, and ultimately of unconscious atoms. The idea that a structure comprised of unconscious atoms could possible be the source of an ability connected to abstract thought is, in a word, nonsensical.
The best-known paintings in the world, the most marvelous works of architecture, the most advanced technological devices … All these are the result of the inspiration of their producers. Can an artist inspired by the landscape at which he looks, or an engineer developing a project for a device which nobody else has ever thought of really be indebted to the unconscious atoms in their brains?
-----
Why do christians HAVE to make fools of themselves by saying things like this? The brain doesn't produce thought? Oh great. Just great. It's just an appendage right?
2006-12-11
02:29:00
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Bhagwad
3
in
Religion & Spirituality